Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumElizabeth Warren has arrived and so have we
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/12/1351333/-Elizabeth-Warren-has-arrived-and-so-have-weSen. Elizabeth Warren has become the rockstar that Barack Obama once was. The difference is that she's already in a position to effect both the national conversation and U.S. governance. When Obama announced himself on the scene in 2004, he was still just running for U.S. Senate. That meant that he was in a position to change the national conversation (which he did) but not necessarily to mold its policy. And when he got the U.S. Senate, he was already eyeing a run for president, so we will never really know what he might have done or wanted to do as a senator.
Not so with Warren. We know what she wants to do (stick up for the little guy), has the expertise to do (protect average consumers from big money interests) and is increasingly doing with expert effect. Thursday, in many ways, Warren arrived on the national political stage as a force to be reckoned withnot simply as a conversation changer but as a steward of policy. This week, Warren became the progressive litmus-test, a one-woman gatekeeper that must be consulted on the way to enacting any law, or at least those that fall within her policy wheelhouse. (We can only hope the right-wingers in the GOP stay as unruly as ever because they will force Boehner to appeal to the Warren-Pelosi tag team in order to get anything through the House.)
Many on the left want Warren to run for president for obvious reasons. In many ways, she is proving herself to be the person that the left yearned for but Obama never actually was. Earlier this week, Moveon.org launched a million-dollar effort to draft Warren for president and on Friday a group of 300 Obama alums signed an open letter urging her to run because, as they put it, they already knew what is was like to believe "in an unlikely candidate who no one thought had a chance."
Warren is not likely to run. As Markos wrote in July, she's not running and that's a good thing. In that post, Markos noted that she doesn't have the ego to run, that doing so would marginalize her, that Hillary would crush her, and that she has all the perch she needs to effect both policy and the national conversation right there in the Senate. Never was that more clear than this week. On every bill the congressional leadership negotiates they will now have to wonder, "What will Warren do?" And at every turn during her presidential run, Hillary Clinton will have to answer the questions that Elizabeth Warren plants in the national conscience.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1664 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren has arrived and so have we (Original Post)
eridani
Dec 2014
OP
Demeter
(85,373 posts)1. Elizabeth walks the walk--Did Obama ever find his comfortable shoes?
I don't want to push Senator Warren, but our country needs her to be as high and as powerful as possible.
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. Ask Gov. Scott Walker and Mr. Richard Trumka.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/20/richard-trumka-democrats_n_864518.html
And how did EFCA do 2007-2011?
Good thing Democrats made Bush go on the record and veto it, huh? And good thing Obama signed it.
And in which Right to Work state was the 2012 Democratic National Convention held because they thought Obama might need it (but it went for Romney anyway)?
And how did EFCA do 2007-2011?
Good thing Democrats made Bush go on the record and veto it, huh? And good thing Obama signed it.
And in which Right to Work state was the 2012 Democratic National Convention held because they thought Obama might need it (but it went for Romney anyway)?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)3. You have gone way beyond my level of information
could you be less cryptic and telegraphic?