Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumElizabeth Warren and the “Present Tensers”
I posted this elsewhere and was asked to cross-post here.
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/15/elizabeth_warren_and_the_present_tensers_a_ridiculous_political_over_reading_that_may_be_true/
The Present Tensers have been kicking this theory for some time. Since the summer, at least. At first it seemed like a ludicrous over-reading from those Democrats who really wanted Elizabeth Warren to run, the reporters and pundits who really wanted to keep writing about whether Elizabeth Warren would run, and the liberal organizations that wanted to set up fundraising vehicles premised on the idea that Elizabeth Warren might run if youre willing to DONATE $10 HERE.
But Warren has had months to clarify and brush off this pedantic point, and here she is, still using the present tense. NPRs Steve Inskeep even asks her about the present tense thing, and she keeps on keeping on in the present tense. She is not running for present, today, at this minute, on this Monday morning, on NPR. Factually true.
This doesnt mean that she is DEFINITELY GOING TO RUN, but sure, shes keeping the door cracked open. Even if shes already decided in her own head that she Will Not Run, it helps the ol personal brand to string people along. It brings attention to her and her pet issues. Were she to rule it out Gen. Sherman-style, horserace reporters might stop caring about her and whatever complex financial derivative mumbo-jumbo shes always going on about.
wc89
(18 posts)This is honestly plausible. However -- I think she feels comfortable not running because she knows Bernie Sanders is going to.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)1968 - LBJ drops out after the New Hampshire primary.
1988 - Mario Cuomo decides not to run at pretty much the last possible moment (there was literally a plane on the tarmac in Albany getting ready to fly the filing paperwork to DC when he pulled the plug).
Inevitable nominees have bowed out before. I think Warren's statements are easily understood as "I'm not running unless Hillary's out or no longer viable; when that happens, ask me again." And she's be foolish to give any other answer.
Autumn
(46,333 posts)This part right here just made my day, Liz may not run but Hillary may not be wearing that crown easy.
And if there is something more to this than a means of keeping the spotlight on herself if she really is planning a run this is a smart way to go about it. If youre a first-third-of-your-first-term senator, and the party apparatus is rallying itself around Hillary Clinton, with all the implicit threats to would-be viable challengers that that implies, play-acting modesty is wise. Youre just keeping your head down and focusing on your Senate business and the people of Massachusetts, etc., youre not thinking about the White House and all that fancy stuff. Then, once all the pressure is bottled up, and a sizable element of the party is begging you to run, you can jump in with an aww shucks, well, sure. It gives off the appearance of being drafted. You wouldnt have dared considered storming Hillary Clintons coronation on your own, but now you have no choice.