Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forum"It’s too early to consider a President Elizabeth Warren, but..."
From the Raleigh NC News & Observer:
Tighten controls on big banks
Its too early to consider a President Elizabeth Warren, but it would be good if the freshman U.S. senator from Massachusetts and scourge of the financial industry could set the Obama administrations priorities for a few months.
Maybe then Americans would start to see action on two big gaps in the presidents record. No. 1 is the failure to vigorously prosecute the villains behind the financial crisis that blew up the U.S. housing market and vaporized many Americans home equity, savings and jobs. No. 2 is the failure to put in place the regulations and oversight needed to keep it from happening again.
...
Despite the progress weve made since 2008, the biggest banks continue to threaten the economy, Warren said in a statement announcing the new bill. The four biggest banks are now 30 percent larger than they were just five years ago, and they have continued to engage in dangerous, high-risk practices that could once again put our economy at risk.
That risk needs the tough approach to oversight that Warren is not afraid to advocate.
Its too early to consider a President Elizabeth Warren, but it would be good if the freshman U.S. senator from Massachusetts and scourge of the financial industry could set the Obama administrations priorities for a few months.
Maybe then Americans would start to see action on two big gaps in the presidents record. No. 1 is the failure to vigorously prosecute the villains behind the financial crisis that blew up the U.S. housing market and vaporized many Americans home equity, savings and jobs. No. 2 is the failure to put in place the regulations and oversight needed to keep it from happening again.
...
Despite the progress weve made since 2008, the biggest banks continue to threaten the economy, Warren said in a statement announcing the new bill. The four biggest banks are now 30 percent larger than they were just five years ago, and they have continued to engage in dangerous, high-risk practices that could once again put our economy at risk.
That risk needs the tough approach to oversight that Warren is not afraid to advocate.
Cross-posted to Good Reads
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2307 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"It’s too early to consider a President Elizabeth Warren, but..." (Original Post)
MannyGoldstein
Aug 2013
OP
pscot
(21,037 posts)1. K&R
Scuba
(53,475 posts)2. Not too early at all.
FairVote
(5 posts)3. I think it would benefit us
if she had more political experience than 4 years in the Senate before she ran. But if she did Iwould probsbly support her in the primaries.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)4. Absolutely not too early.
IMO the country is starving for someone like her right now.