Movies
Related: About this forumI saw Asteroid City so that you don't have to
Its ponderous, dull, and annoying in its self conscious artificiality.
I often enjoy quirky movies, but the quirkiness in this film was so over done that I was tired of it after the first five minutes. After the first 15 minutes, I was ready to leave, but I stuck around until I finished my popcorn. Once the popcorn was done, we left. I would pay the money again, just to not have to watch it.
Im afraid the critics who are raving it up are scared to call it for the stinker it is because they dont want to lose their access. So Ill do it myself: this movie is a stinker. Avoid it.
I suppose there is something to get about it, but really, its not worth the effort to claim that you get it.
 Go patronize some high school play in your local community and give your money, time, and attention to someone who is making an honest effort, working on it, and deserves it.
I would actually be interested in hearing from someone with a different viewpoint. 
Wolf Frankula
(3,669 posts)I've been there. I prefer Mars. I'll never go there again.
Wolf
temporary311
(957 posts)into any Wes Anderson movie for me. I've tried, but my tastes just aren't compatible with his style.
ZZenith
(4,321 posts)The suspension of disbelief is so necessary for me to enjoy a movie, and I cant watch one of his films without sensing the director in the room, the camera person, the grips, hell, even the makeup artist just outside of frame. And the dialogue is nowhere near clever enough to hold my attention.
Doc Sportello
(7,962 posts)I've tried with three or four of his movies and can't make it through them. I might have watched Rushmore all the way through but it was a chore. He is so overrated for exactly the reasons you mentioned. Here, loook at me, I'm the director. All style and no substance and unfortunately too many critics and fans buy into it.
I was going to sat the same. His movies are boring as hell.
LonePirate
(13,893 posts)SPOILERS BELOW!!!
Although the black and white scenes explain the bulk of the story in Asteroid City, they should have been cut along with much of the pointless conversations between Schwartzman and Johansson. The movie should have focused exclusively on the asteroid and the surprise guests. I think a good movie could have been made from that. What Anderson gave us instead was barely above dreadful.
NBachers
(18,132 posts)Theres a saying that goes Dont ever let them catch you acting. I guess this was supposed to be a wry take of it, were you caught everybody acting all the damn time. Didnt work for me.
Xavier Breath
(5,036 posts)and in that one I remarked about how disappointed I was by this particular effort. I found the framing device he employed to be absolutely jarring. Each time it occurred and we got more play/actor exposition, I was pulled completely out of the story. It was wholly unnecessary.
In my book he hit his zenith with the one-two punch of Moonrise Kingdom and The Grand Budapest Hotel. Since then it's been three dogs in a row. Well, The French Dispatch had its moments, I guess.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,558 posts)BWdem4life
(2,468 posts)Where the lines are weak and the plot is shitty?
Thanks for the heads up, though I rarely watch movies anyway.
John1956PA
(3,374 posts)samnsara
(18,282 posts)royable
(1,369 posts)I found it funny and fascinating and Ive continued to ruminate on it every day since. Ive seen all of Wes Andersons films but one (his first), and while it may not have been the one I liked most, it was near the top. From several peoples comments, it sounds to me as though you were expecting or at least hoping for the film to be more traditional, and thats not what Anderson does.
The several other theatre goers at the late showing I attended liked it too, I would say. There were lots of laughs and chuckles throughout, and no one left early. My two cents.
marble falls
(62,079 posts)"The several other theatre goers at the late showing" Several? At a Late Friday Night showing on opening week???
Even the Anderson culties didn't show up?
royable
(1,369 posts)And I didnt interview the other theatre goers (who I didnt know) to see if they were culties I also didnt know there were Wes A. culties.
I was just reporting on my reactions and my experience at the theatre, and I can understand why some people wouldnt care for Andersons work and this movie. Its not for everyone.
NBachers
(18,132 posts)Thanks for responding!
Response to NBachers (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bif
(24,013 posts)I'll probably watch it tonight.
Eliot Rosewater
(32,536 posts)The first time I got 3 minutes past the opening credits and the 2nd time I got another 3 minutes, maybe 4.
I will try again and then fast forward to the end. I dont seem to care for it either.
What I want to see is Oppenheimer.
bif
(24,013 posts)I guess either you like Wes Anderson or you don't. I love his whacky sense of humor.
Xavier Breath
(5,036 posts)and not like this movie. Practically everyone in this thread is a testament to that. I too enjoy his sense of humor. But, he made a clunker IMHO. Better luck to us all with his next film.
bif
(24,013 posts)The story was a bit weak. But the visuals were very entertaining. Not his best film, but enjoyable none the less.
Xavier Breath
(5,036 posts)The color portions looked like a live-action Roadrunner cartoon, and I say that with sincere praise.
Whenever his next theatrical release occurs I'll go and see it. Unfortunately, I believe his next project is with Netflix, so I won't be seeing that.
bif
(24,013 posts)Based on a Roald Dahl short story.
Xavier Breath
(5,036 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(10,199 posts)instead its candy colored dreck.