Basketball
Related: About this forumNBA finals game 6: When the Warriors were down by 1 in the last...
few seconds, why didn't they go down low to Boogie Cousins for a 2 point shot/possible foul intead of the 3 by Curry which everyone and their least favorite cousin was looking for?
They just needed one to tie if Cousins got fouled.That would have been so unexpected, with Curry as the decoy, it just may have caught the Raptors by surprise.
![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
calguy
(5,850 posts)brush
(58,807 posts)A 1 has a better chance of going in. I'm surprised no one n any of the coverage shows mentioned anything but that Curry doesn't have a good record on last second, game-winning shots.
Tikki
(14,801 posts)they deserved the Championship.
Tikki
brush
(58,807 posts)the Warriors down two starters. I doubt they would've won if Durant and Thompson had been healthy the whole series.
But they won, so there it is. 10 years from now no one rememers who came in second.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)who could get his shot off. Big guys get doubled and troubled.
brush
(58,807 posts)also so everyone knew Steph was going to get the ball, and he got doubled on the 3. He himself maybe should've drove. All they needed was a 2 or a foul then foul shots.
I don't get why they thought they had to go for a 3 when a 2 would've done it. That is really my point. A 3 wan't needed and a 2 is a higher percentage shot. Even Kwali Leonard had been making mid-range 2s all series. Maybe the coaching staff slept on that one.