#PRDP Post# What are the *real* reasons that any person wouldn't love Hillary as our nominee?
Let's create a definitive list based on what we absolutely know in our guts.
1. They don't like women
2. They don't like strong women
3. They are Republicans
4. Benghazi!!!
5. The Clenis!!!
6. PDS (Pony Deficiency Syndrome)
7. Ratf@#kers!
8. Thinks she's too ambitious.
I think that covers it. Any other possibilities?
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)In what sense?
I never, EVER thought of her as "strong".
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Just think back to all the tough fights she's taken on and won.
GeorgeGist
(25,431 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'll add that.
Daemonaquila
(1,712 posts)Seriously? Nobody can legitimately think she's a poor candidate? If a Dem (Hillary or someone better) is going to win the presidency, this kind of juvenile, cheerleading mentality will have to be replaced by serious consideration of why she ISN'T universally loved even within her own party, and which candidate best fits what we need in a POTUS. And I'm not talking about just being a consummate insider and having lots of corporate buddies as a qualification.
mike_c
(36,337 posts)Perhaps you should look through Manny's posts if you're unfamiliar with his style. His damning with faint praise is strong, young Skywalker.
Personally, I like to fuck a rat every now and then.
give me a good reason for not putting you on Ignore, just based on that post.
mike_c
(36,337 posts)...I've been ignoring me for years.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Now you are getting the maternal instinct activated....
peacebird
(14,195 posts)On the campaign trail then veer back to corporatist, DLC policies favoring the 1%
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)fail by default, since those are the only ones that have every brought us growth and strength as a nation and people.
Which means the only a Rethug has to do to stop the progressives is vote for the DLC candidate. The Democrats would still get their win, the country continues to lose.
Our grandchildren might be the first generation to spit on the people who came before them.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)She doesn't speak in declarative sentences, either. You can't be a populist without taking a side and defending it.
She likes to compromise, like Bill. Triangulation is not populist, as long as you are triangulating between the powerful and the powerless....gravity always favors the powerful.
She knows lots of rich people. I'd like to see some of her un-rich acquaintance, please!
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Not possible?
really?
Maybe not, women of child bearing years will die, that one is not just possible but CERTAIN..
But probably President Cruz or Rubio wont actually put them to death, just make permanent 2nd class citizens of them
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)you are holding out for.
Nader?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Impossible I tells ya.
progressoid
(50,753 posts)and Ron Brown.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Wait...wrong group
Mbrow
(1,090 posts)what about Jerry Brown? Twice he's pulled California's butt out of the fire..... Just Saying.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)it sounds silly
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)It's like listening to a broken record from an "American Horror" episode