Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:28 AM Apr 2015

If Clinton Is Serious About Economic Populism, She Should Come Out Against Fast Track


John Nichols,The Nation, April 17, 2015

Hillary Clinton has backed NAFTA-style “free trade” agreements and she has opposed NAFTA-style “free trade” agreements. Like many other prominent Democrats, she has been inconsistent in her support of what is best for workers, the environment and human rights.

But Clinton has a chance to get trade policy right when it matters. And when it matters is now.

Despite overwhelming opposition from labor, farm, environmental, and social-justice groups, Congress is preparing to consider whether to provide Obama with the “fast track” authority he seeks to construct a “free trade” deal linking the North American and Asian nations of the Pacific Rim. Imagine the North American Free Trade Agreement on steroids and you get a sense of what is at stake.

Yet, so far, Clinton’s office has offered only a statement about how she is “watching closely” as the debate evolves and a suggestion that she wants “greater prosperity and security for American families, not trade for trade’s sake.”


So what's Clinton's stand on the TPP? Well apparently "she is watching closely". I think her consternation tells us a lot about how serious to take her new populism.

more at: http://www.thenation.com/blog/204649/if-clinton-serious-about-economic-populism-she-should-come-out-against-fast-track

RUN BERNIE RUN
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PatrickforO

(15,112 posts)
8. I love your signature quote.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:24 AM
Apr 2015

I'm watching Hillary indeed. Because I don't think she is a populist at all. Your signature quote actually predicts the election results, I believe, if Hillary is our candidate.

Of course, she could still win because the Republicans in the Klown Kar are all pretty much crazy...

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,579 posts)
7. Thanks for the reminder...some champion of the people. Forget Scooby Doo...
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:17 AM
Apr 2015

Eliza-liza-beth, where are you?... We got somewhere to go now...

antigop

(12,778 posts)
10. how can she come out against fast track when she played a leading part in negotiating the TPP?
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:30 AM
Apr 2015

John Nichols should know this...I think he's trying to box HRC in, just as Elizabeth Warren did.

HRC can't come out against it because she'll tick off Wall Street and her corporate donors.

HRC can't come out for it because it will tick off the unions and people who have to work for a living.

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
3. " If Clinton Is Serious About Economic Populism"...
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:47 AM
Apr 2015

Her entire "Getting Started"
roll out, would have spoken
to growing wealth inequality,
not that Americans HAVE
fought back from tough times.

She would have addressed the
real world concerns of each
"actor" in her video in terms
of the actual economic situation,
not the imagined world
she presented.

She would have identified
who, what, how and, when
the "deck was stacked"
and made a commitment
to righting that injustice.

After all, a "stacked deck"
is a tacit admission of cheating!
And we know it was criminal
in some instances.

So yeah, "if she is serious"

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
5. Yes. It's very easy to say that things should be better for the 99%, but it's quite another to be
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:58 AM
Apr 2015

specific about making the wealthy pay their fair share.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,579 posts)
6. Id be shocked if Hillary rails against fast track authority, but then maybe her pollsters and political consultants will convince her to do it.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:13 AM
Apr 2015

One can hope.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. I see her spouting rhetoric about how important it is for the agreement
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:42 AM
Apr 2015

to help the 99%. That's easy and won't bother Goldman-Sachs a bit. After it's passage she can be critical of the so-called agreement and continue to pretend to have the best interest of the 99% at heart.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
13. The TPP is sacred to the corporatist. I cannot imagine HRC saying a word against fast track.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:22 AM
Apr 2015

I would be happy to find I am wrong.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
12. I agree. She must speak up. Our failure to support TPP is not because we don't understand it.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:19 AM
Apr 2015

The problem is we understand it all too well.

Tariffs now!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»If Clinton Is Serious Abo...