Why Smart Democrats Worry About Turnout From The Base In 2016

[eridani]

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2015/07/why-smart-democrats-worry-about-turnout.html#sthash.bpfEsXHH.dpuf

When Wall Street gets bent out of shape over the populism of Bernie Sanders and, especially, Elizabeth Warren, they go whining and fuming to Schumer, and to their House tool, Steve Israel. Both are working hard to please Wall Street by recruiting conservative pro-Wall Street, pro-Big Business candidates to run as Democrats. Schumer is fighting like a savage to make sure lifelong Republican and Wall Street suck-up Patrick Murphy is the Democratic nominee for Marco Rubio's open Senate seat in Florida, and he is vigilant that as few Democrats as possible from the Elizabeth Warren wing of the party get near party nominations.

Over on the House side, Steve Israel and hapless sock-puppet Ben Ray Luján are also running around recruiting Blue Dogs, New Dems and outright Republicans. Their latest is Mike Derrick, to run against popular Republican Elise Stefanik in NY-21, a district in which Obama beat Romney 63.3 to 35.2%-- a phenomenal 28.1 point spread. Derrick is a Republican who's conveniently calling himself a Democrat now. Apparently Israel doesn't think a real Democrat could win in NY-21, despite Obama's landslide there. Similarly, Schumer doesn't want Grayson, an outspoken tribune for working families, to win a Senate seat, and his solution is Republican-"turned"-Democrat Patrick Murphy, a New Dem backbencher who votes with the Republican Party more than nearly any other Democrat in the House.


There are scores of cases just like this across the country. And Democrats wonder why their base doesn't turn out? In the Real Clear Politics piece linked above, Alexis Simendinger takes a look at the dilemma Democrats face with corrupt Wall Street-owned careerists like Schumer and Israel running the party. He sees, like almost anyone outside of DC can see, that base Democrats are extremely skeptical about what their party is offering up. "They doubt, he writes, "presidential contenders can deliver favored reforms from Washington, no matter how enticing the policy agendas sound. Those doubts depress enthusiasm about next year’s White House contest and could impact turnout for the eventual Democratic nominee."

[Vincardog]

1. DUH... is this news?

[xfundy]

3. News?

I'd never heard the repigs were trying to run this repig as a dem this cycle. You heard? Bully for you.

It's news to me, so YES, it's news. Why don't you go back to farting rainbows and stop ass-u-ming others have the supreme knowledge and connections you seem to claim you have.

[demwing]

4. Well...this isn't the "Latest Breaking News" forum

...so think happy thoughts!

[Ford_Prefect]

2. They've been playing that tune since Reagan won and it was never true.

Only the big money boys make it appear so every electoral season. Tilting at every more elusive windmills of the ephemeral "uncomitted" voters.