Why Is It So Hard To Test Whether Drivers Are Stoned?

[SHRED]

Here's a fairly in-depth article that details why testing for cannabis intoxication is not simple and in my opinion is very unfair.

Some of this article I thought was a bit over the top but there are some good points in it. They could have left out the Cheech and Chong clip and the "28 days" seems unreal to me.

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/02/09/466147956/why-its-so-hard-to-make-a-solid-test-for-driving-while-stoned


...

[LiberalArkie]

1. It is really easy. Just open a bag of Doritos and just sit it near the driver.

[SHRED]

2. :-)

[LiberalArkie]

4. I also think that "If I put 2 apples in a basket and then put 3 more apples in the basket, how many

apples are in the basket" would work. If it took more that 15 seconds they are stoned, the longer the response took they higher they are. If the officer has to repeat the question several times, I think the driver should be ticketed as "toasted".

[2pooped2pop]

3. In Indiana any amt even if from a month prior gets you a dui

Pot can still be in your blood test, yes blood tests are given. Any trace is automatically guilty. You get a DUI.

Anyone caught with pot in their Car gets a DUI. It's a money making scheme sine u get jail time plus a years probation which is costly plus 40-80 hours of community service which is costly, months of drug classes which are costly, drug testing- costly. Then eventually many violate probation either by smoking or drinking or even getting pulled over and then you do your full jail term, lose your job etc

It's a big crock to keep the jails filled and bring in cash.

[B Calm]

5. Same thing for employers too. What I smoked 3 or 4 weeks ago on my own time

shouldn't effect my employment!

[SHRED]

6. What you smoked the night before shouldn't matter

[B Calm]

7. Exactly!

I was just pointing out how long one can test positive, even though the person is not in any means impaired.

[Downwinder]

8. LEOs are not qualified to make a medical diagnosis.