Pushing Gun Plan, O’Malley Says ‘Draw Your Own Conclusions’ About Sanders’ Record.
Meeting with East Harlem gun control activists, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley—a dark horse candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination—debuted an aggressive plan to regulate firearms and invited voters to “draw their own conclusions” about rival Sen. Bernie Sanders’ history on the issue.
Mr. O’Malley started the press conference at the Boys & Girls Harbor Education Center by highlighting his own record of passing “comprehensive gun safety legislation” in his home state and rolling out his proposals for new federal rules that he claimed could cut the number of shooting deaths in half by 2025. His national package included universal background checks and fingerprint licensing for all firearms regardless of where they are purchased, a federal gun registry, tough new penalties for violators—and the repeal of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which prevented people from suing gun makers or sellers when their weapons were used criminally.
The candidate ripped the law, which a Republic Congress passed and which Mr. Sanders—a self-identified independent socialist who caucuses with the Democrats—supported. Mr. O’Malley argued that it was a sell-out to the companies that make guns and lobbying groups like the National Rifle Association which advocate against regulation.
“It wasn’t until 2005 that Congress shielded gun manufacturers from the same sort of product liability responsibility that other products would have. There’s an ability and you can have standards and ways to make your product safer, in order to safeguard human life, you have a duty to do that. And so I believe this was nothing short of the NRA flexing its political muscle to shield the gun manufacturers,” Mr. O’Malley said when asked about the bill.
Asked about Mr. Sanders’ vote, Mr. O’Malley declined to comment.
“No, I’ll let you draw your own conclusions,” he said.
However, he did call upon every Democrat in the field to roll out their own gun control proposals, saying the issue was “past its time.”
“I have said this is strategical for my administration, and important to our nation, of cutting gun deaths in half within the next 10 years. And I hope I’m not the last candidate to present common-sense gun safety legislation in this race. I think people are longing for it,” he said. “So I hope the other candidates might also join me.”
Representing an overwhelmingly white rural state with a strong sportsman culture, Mr. Sanders has historically leaned somewhat to the right of many Democratic colleagues on gun issues even as he has tilted hard to the left on most other matters. Still, his past support for some gun control has earned him a “D-minus” grade from the National Rifle Association.
Nonetheless, some liberal critics have pointed up Mr. Sanders’ past positions on the issue as a sign he is out of touch with urban Democrats and their concerns.
Mr. O’Malley, the former mayor of Baltimore, highlighted that his state has both rural, urban and suburban areas and claimed his state’s regulations enjoyed support from all quarters.
http://observer.com/2015/09/pushing-gun-plan-omalley-says-draw-your-own-conclusions-about-sanders-record/
= new reply since forum marked as read
by candidates does indicate that I've looked closely enough to have formed an opinion based on those observances, and it never occurred to me that a username like mine would lead others to read it as edsquire. (i don't think that part of your reply was meant for me, was it? 
)
