'O'Malley's 7% . . . may have him cutting . . into Sanders' share of the anti-Clinton vote'

[elleng]

'O'Malley's 7% appears to be the best he's done in a national poll by any company to date.
That may have him cutting a little bit into Sanders' share of the anti-Clinton vote and
driving up her margin over the field. Even after a couple debates O'Malley still hasn't
achieved 50% name recognition though, with 27% rating him favorably and 18%
unfavorably but 55% having no opinion one way or another. By contrast every candidate
on the Republican side has at least 50% name recognition except for Jim Gilmore.'

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_111915.pdf

[uppityperson]

1. Would you please edit the thread title as it's so long with out a break that it's messing

up formatting for me? Thanks

[elleng]

2. Done. Thanks for reading.

[askew]

3. That's why Debbie's plan to hide the debates and limit outside debates has killed O'Malley's

campaign (exactly like she intended it to). Less than 50% know who O'Malley is. It's impossible to raise money without the free advertising needed to raise name recognition. So frustrating.

[elleng]

4. Yes.

[Koinos]

5. Maybe O'Malley should host a "reality" TV show to raise his name recognition.

Maybe O'Malley should host a reality TV show to raise his name recognition, instead of proposing comprehensive and detailed plans to protect the environment and save the country.

As Trump the "immigrant-hating carnival barker" polls higher among the nutjob uninformed by stating that Muslim American citizens should carry unconstitutional identification of their religious membership...

This isn't the country I was born and raised in. It is becoming a reality show series based on "Idiocracy."