Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Harry Litman approves Lawrence Tribe's alternative path in impeachment. [View all]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/06/10/can-democrats-break-republican-hammerlock-impeachment/?utm_term=.9442d52a829c
Here's part of it.
Tribes fundamental insight is that the House could pursue a full-bodied investigation of the president, including an opportunity for Trump to mount a defense, without committing itself to a referral for trial in the Senate.
Rather, the House could culminate its investigation with independent fact-findings leading, if those facts bear out, to a Sense of the House resolution detailing Trumps offenses against the Constitution.
There are a number of apparent virtues to Tribes proposal. Perhaps most importantly, it provides an outlet for House members to respond to the extraordinary gravity of the presidents assault on the rule of law.
However politically expedient, the idea that the House could simply give a pass to the presidents conduct and await the electorates verdict in 2020 is intolerable. Doing nothing is an offense to their own oath of office, and would at worst sanction and at best trivialize Trumps shameless ransacking of constitutional order.
Second, an investigation culminating in a full factual account and a Sense of the House resolution would be a counterweight to the official narrative from the Justice Department in the form of Attorney General William P. Barrs ludicrous reading of the Mueller report, which, as it stands, is the sole official judgment on the facts of Trumps conduct. As with the reports of the 9/11 Commission and the Warren Commission, the country needs a credible official narrative that fairly lays out the facts and reaches fair and broadly accepted conclusions.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harry Litman approves Lawrence Tribe's alternative path in impeachment. [View all]
Grasswire2
Jun 2019
OP
Nancy will have to give this some consideration. There is no way she CAN miss this...
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#1
I'm sure she's considering it. I wouldn't be surprised if she's discussed it with Tribe privately
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#4
He's gotten feedback from experienced politicos though, so I don't think he's speaking through a
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#5
Sure - I'm not saying his political view isn't well-founded. As I said, he has a lot of political
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#7
Tribe was on MSNBC just a few minutes ago. The way he explained his idea was not for the House
napi21
Jun 2019
#3
It is more than censure though. It would be full investigational hearings resulting in "findings"
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#6
In fact they can. If you know more than Laurence Tribe, Neal Katayal,, Norm Eisen,
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#16
Do our Dem leaders in the House know this? Why haven't they mentioned this before?
Honeycombe8
Jun 2019
#8
They complete the process they can decide then whether to refer articles of impeachment...
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#12
Wouldn't that be equally apparent if the House impeached and the Senate acquitted?
onenote
Jun 2019
#31
Sure, but the House doesn't need to give the Senate the chance to acquit.
Cuthbert Allgood
Jun 2019
#35
Which will simply allow the repubs to change the subject from the findings to the failure to follow
onenote
Jun 2019
#37