Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Harry Litman approves Lawrence Tribe's alternative path in impeachment. [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)7. Sure - I'm not saying his political view isn't well-founded. As I said, he has a lot of political
savvy. But when he's talking political ramifications, he's in Nancy Pelosi's area of expertise.
And part of her expertise is that, like most smart, effective people, she gathers information and advice from many different sources. Then, again like most smart, effective people, she considers it weighs it against all of the factors she's dealing with, synthesizes it, and then makes an intelligent decision.
My point is that, while Professor Tribe's constitutional analysis - i.e., that the House has the power to do what he's recommending - is probably unassailable, his position and expertise as a brilliant law professor does not mean that Pelosi has to simply unquestionably accept his political guidance just because it came from him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Harry Litman approves Lawrence Tribe's alternative path in impeachment. [View all]
Grasswire2
Jun 2019
OP
Nancy will have to give this some consideration. There is no way she CAN miss this...
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#1
I'm sure she's considering it. I wouldn't be surprised if she's discussed it with Tribe privately
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#4
He's gotten feedback from experienced politicos though, so I don't think he's speaking through a
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#5
Sure - I'm not saying his political view isn't well-founded. As I said, he has a lot of political
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#7
Tribe was on MSNBC just a few minutes ago. The way he explained his idea was not for the House
napi21
Jun 2019
#3
It is more than censure though. It would be full investigational hearings resulting in "findings"
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#6
In fact they can. If you know more than Laurence Tribe, Neal Katayal,, Norm Eisen,
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#16
Do our Dem leaders in the House know this? Why haven't they mentioned this before?
Honeycombe8
Jun 2019
#8
They complete the process they can decide then whether to refer articles of impeachment...
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#12
Wouldn't that be equally apparent if the House impeached and the Senate acquitted?
onenote
Jun 2019
#31
Sure, but the House doesn't need to give the Senate the chance to acquit.
Cuthbert Allgood
Jun 2019
#35
Which will simply allow the repubs to change the subject from the findings to the failure to follow
onenote
Jun 2019
#37