Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It just dawned on me. (Senate trial) [View all]unblock
(54,243 posts)26. what a waste of time, reading an article that adds nothing and supports my view.
"although it is likely that he would kick weighty decisions to senators for a vote."
at several points in the article it makes it clear that roberts is likely to tread as lightly as possible and to avoid making decisions of consequence. it noted that one question rehnquist ruled on was that the house managers shouldn't say the senate was like a jury in this case, because it's also like a court. wow, major issue that
roberts is extremely unlikely to prevent the senate from diving into biden-smearing territory.
there's nothing in the article that suggests otherwise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I never said this would not happen. In trials, every possible spin is attempted by the defense
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#6
What is the alternative you would suggest? I believe a very effective case will be laid out
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#10
We face enough day to day demoralization and disquieting revelations. Keep some fath.
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#13
roberts will preside, but will not be doing much to determine what witnesses are called.
unblock
Nov 2019
#9
Even McConnell has made it clear that Roberts will rule on any motions made by opposing sides
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#15
Didn't His Assholiness, Justice Roberts, preside over the legalization of bribery and gerrymandering
lagomorph777
Nov 2019
#22
The House lawyers present the case; Trump's lawyers can rebut, but that is not the function of
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#2
They will try, but that is why having the most effective impeachment witnesses testsify
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#7
You keep mistakenly pointing to the VP having authority over impeachment trial. THAT IS NOT TRUE
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#14
i started that post with "roberts will preside", which i thought would make it clear
unblock
Nov 2019
#24
I'll take my lead from Laurence Tribe and Neil Katyal on this. I find their opinions to be far more
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#25
there is a big difference between "realism" and "defeatism". That's all I'm saying.
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#30
From McConnell's own mouth: "The chief justice is the chair. And senators are not allowed to speak"
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#16
Roberts has the authority and ability to make the role as he wishes. READ THE ARTICLE
hlthe2b
Nov 2019
#23
what a waste of time, reading an article that adds nothing and supports my view.
unblock
Nov 2019
#26