Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could we please begin our examination of why "all the polls were wrong" by vowing [View all]YessirAtsaFact
(2,112 posts)41. I partially agree
Process is essential, but we have to be able to get back to the source of the votes in order to do a real audit of an election.
You can't base an audit the placement of a finger on a touchscreen. Once the screen is cleared for the next voter, there is no independent record of the input, just data in a database.
Scanned ballots in locked boxes can be counted by human beings after the fact and compared to the captured data.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Could we please begin our examination of why "all the polls were wrong" by vowing [View all]
Atticus
Nov 2020
OP
And I start by saying we can't refuse to investigate and then fold our arms and scratch our
Atticus
Nov 2020
#23
The polls told us Collins, Ernst, Graham, Tillis were in trouble. They weren't.
Beakybird
Nov 2020
#3
If the polls were more accurate, I would have donated to Gideon and Cunningham
Beakybird
Nov 2020
#36
Americans aren't more dishonest than S Koreans, our polling is horrid compared to theirs
uponit7771
Nov 2020
#15
I think people are afraid to confront the topic because they don't want to discourage voting
ecstatic
Nov 2020
#10
We need to eliminate any voting machine that doesn't scan a human marked ballot
YessirAtsaFact
Nov 2020
#12
They polls weren't that far off....but they still have a lot to figure out on them.
cbdo2007
Nov 2020
#13
+100000 I hope We The People decide to make some Good Trouble over this issue.
Tommymac
Nov 2020
#39
I'm baffled why people don't understand polls are not subject to suppression/tampering.
Pobeka
Nov 2020
#21
I just read your post to my wife and commented "This poster is obviously a statistician
Atticus
Nov 2020
#27
That is built into the confidence interval. That's WHY there is a confidence interval. n/t
Pobeka
Nov 2020
#32
It is not "built into" the confidence interval, it is an assumption of the confidence interval
Nederland
Nov 2020
#45
If you are going to argue that pollsters don't know how to take a random sample, good luck with that
Pobeka
Nov 2020
#46
Nate Silver says the problem lies in getting a random sample, good luck arguing with him
Nederland
Nov 2020
#54
It was not just "the" poll---it was ALL the polls. I can't believe they all chose unrepresentative
Atticus
Nov 2020
#33
Your response discusses "a" poll. My post discussed "all" polls. Big difference. nt
Atticus
Nov 2020
#49
We disagree. You make assumptions I consider unsupported and unsupportable. You can
Atticus
Nov 2020
#51
No, let's get through this. It seems to me after examining the polls there was a change very
Demsrule86
Nov 2020
#44