Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you support direct military intervention into Ukraine by NATO immediately? [View all]ColinC
(10,955 posts)112. Nobody assured anybody of anything.
The LIKELIHOOD however, based on history, is quite slim. Truth is, Putin can launch a nuke at us now out frustration if he wanted to -because quite frankly, our weapons are a main reason he has not been able to take Ukraine. But for some reason that hasn't happened despite many threats of that nature.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you support direct military intervention into Ukraine by NATO immediately? [View all]
ColinC
Jul 2022
OP
You prefer a faster end to life on the planet than climate change is bringing?
Hermit-The-Prog
Jul 2022
#4
You're willing to chance the destruction of the entire human race?
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#13
No, you're not talking deterrence, you're talking about directly engaging Russian
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#26
Have a great weekend and think about what you're actually proposing and the consequences
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#47
Well, good luck with that and I hope you come home safe and not fucked up in the head. nt.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#53
Ohhh, another one willing to chance the destruction of civilization.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#15
If Russia were to threaten to use nukes on a NATO member would you expect us to back down?
ripcord
Jul 2022
#22
Threatening to use nukes and attacking a NATO member are 2 entirely different things.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jul 2022
#24
It seems they got it right. Basically you are okay with risking the destruction of civilization
ColinC
Jul 2022
#32
No. But basing action on the intangible line of "attacking a NATO member" while disregarding
ColinC
Jul 2022
#42
NATO is far from just a defensive alliance if Iraq and Afghanistan mean anything
ColinC
Jul 2022
#46
You have crossed the intangerine line. I am sending a squadron of nuclear carp after you.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jul 2022
#54
We're not staying out of this war, we're providing billions of dollars of weaponry, training
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#31
i say, send in a secret Assasination force to destroy Putin and his allies
Trueblue1968
Jul 2022
#96
No one is dumping anything on NATO if they act it will be in their own self interest
ripcord
Jul 2022
#25
The UN Security Council was the organization that authorised the use of force in Libya.
Beastly Boy
Jul 2022
#116
...and probably a better example than Ukraine for racially prejudiced military intervention
ColinC
Jul 2022
#90
Exactly. I was reading your comment as a call to arms, rather than a plain statement of fact.
Hermit-The-Prog
Jul 2022
#79
And when a NATO partner is attacked, it also doesn't necessarily warrant an attack
ColinC
Jul 2022
#87
NATO should have gone in when Russia attacked. I do not believe Putin will start WWIII.
Dysfunctional
Jul 2022
#78
I think the Ukrainian Army is doing a pretty good job on Russia's military.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#125
True, but I'm still dead set against US/NATO direct military intervention,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jul 2022
#128