Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ancianita

(38,930 posts)

2. If you mean a total gag? No. If you mean "make your client stfu up about these things", yes.

Reply to Chainfire (Reply #1)

Mon Oct 16, 2023, 09:51 AM

Oct 2023

The ruling will be consistent with facts and arguments laid out by both sides.

All judges are called that because they also judge based on every single relevant thing outside the docket info, too, that reinforces the prosecution's claims.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

10/16 2023 Court's In Session -- while we wait... [View all] ancianita Oct 2023 OP

I expect the ruling will be the infamous STFU order. Chainfire Oct 2023 #1

If you mean a total gag? No. If you mean "make your client stfu up about these things", yes. ancianita Oct 2023 #2

What the Jack Smith team is saying in court. ancianita Oct 2023 #3

Chutkan is now in recess. idk what she might be doing, but venture to guess ancianita Oct 2023 #4