Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dpibel

(3,439 posts)

7. Good use of quotes!

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 5, 2023, 09:37 PM

Dec 2023

Totally agree with you on that.

Not sure that your semi-cites deal with the theory in the OP.

It's strange to me that you're so hostile to a potential disqualifier.

I understand that you represent as a totally fact-based boots on the ground organizer.

I don't understand your knee-jerk opposition to any possible way to keep Trump out of the White House.

You seem to have a zero-sum approach to things that's not, IMHO, quite consistent with the world as it exists.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A question about section 3 of the 14th Amendment [View all] solara Dec 2023 OP

Yes. 2naSalit Dec 2023 #1

No. brooklynite Dec 2023 #2

I'd point to history. Igel Dec 2023 #4

Your legal analysis! dpibel Dec 2023 #5

I'll further point to the rulings in Michigan, Minnesota and Colorado and informing my "legal analysis" brooklynite Dec 2023 #6

Good use of quotes! dpibel Dec 2023 #7

Its not that I'm "hostile"... brooklynite Dec 2023 #8

And every chip in his wall helps dpibel Dec 2023 #9

Some people - other than me - have no clue that the 14th Amendment-Article 3 exists... brooklynite Dec 2023 #11

Yes elleng Dec 2023 #3

Some history suggests the answer is no. onenote Dec 2023 #10