General Discussion

WhiskeyGrinder

(24,082 posts)

37. .

Mon Sep 30, 2024, 07:57 PM

Sep 30

The baby can survive outside the uterus so there’s no reason not to choose that.

If there's no reason to "choose that," we don't need a law preventing it. Defining a situation that requires exceptions only creates barriers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lemonwurst BlueHurricane

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property' [View all] Jrose Sep 30 OP

Link to the order: Ocelot II Sep 30 #1

Thanks, Ocelot II for the link. I was having technical problems with that! Jrose Sep 30 #24

Yes! Thank you! ❤️ littlemissmartypants Sep 30 #33

Whatever has happened to the Fulton County case? Sogo Sep 30 #38

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 UpInArms Oct 1 #42

This is awesome. liberalmuse Sep 30 #2

This is so great! Timeflyer Sep 30 #3

Wow! DET Sep 30 #4

I always wonder how any normal person does that. efhmc Sep 30 #6

The judge has a way with understanding Tweedy Sep 30 #9

No kidding! ☹️ For those of us who practice "woo" white light this good judge, his workplace, home, and family. electric_blue68 Sep 30 #21

Excellent quote. efhmc Sep 30 #5

Finally! A jurist who understands autonomy and the right to privacy Tweedy Sep 30 #7

I hope many of us in this country will remember 2024 as the turning point Jrose Sep 30 #34

So well said. Can we replace one of our current SC Justices with this person? ms liberty Sep 30 #8

I think he just interviewed for the job cpamomfromtexas Oct 1 #50

Oh hell yeah AmBlue Sep 30 #10

The 19th amendment was necessary! dickthegrouch Oct 1 #48

"during this period when the fetus cannot survive outside the womb" Okay, so what happens at "viability"? WhiskeyGrinder Sep 30 #11

It's basically the same result as Roe v. Wade. Ocelot II Sep 30 #14

Which is why I say that Roe is the floor and we have to do better with whatever comes next. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 30 #15

Totally agree LearnedHand Sep 30 #20

At that point I think it becomes a medical decision with a physician. Joinfortmill Sep 30 #28

Yes. Tweedy Sep 30 #22

Agreed lonely bird Oct 1 #44

Absolute bs Tweedy Oct 1 #53

If the fetus is viable then it's called a birth VMA131Marine Sep 30 #35

. WhiskeyGrinder Sep 30 #37

when i offered to take a friend to get a abortion in the 70s... samnsara Oct 1 #43

Can we charge Rethug politicians with practicing medicine without a license? Seinan Sensei Sep 30 #12

Yes!!! Demovictory9 Sep 30 #13

Finally someone put into words senseandsensibility Sep 30 #16

"Oh, noes!!! rubbersole Sep 30 #17

I think that when President Harris is looking for candidates to fill new SCOTUS positions, flashman13 Sep 30 #18

Why didn't you post the link? littlemissmartypants Sep 30 #19

Sorry, was having tech glitches! 'Ocelot II' did thankfully post the link. Jrose Sep 30 #25

No need to apologize. Appreciate the post. Joinfortmill Sep 30 #30

Oh, no. Technical glitches are no fun. I hope you can get them ironed out. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Sep 30 #32

.... AKwannabe Sep 30 #23

Finally. GB_RN Sep 30 #26

Wow. Right on! Joinfortmill Sep 30 #27

WE ARE NOT GOING BACK, PERIOD. Clouds Passing Sep 30 #29

Finally, a freaking judge who "gets it!" slightlv Sep 30 #31

There's a cartoon going around GopherGal Oct 1 #49

The forced kidney donation example slightlv Oct 1 #51

Wow, I'm so happy with this order and this judge! ...the robustness and strong defense against the abortion ban. liberalla Sep 30 #36

At last! dlk Oct 1 #39

Wow. Just wow. Native Oct 1 #40

National Socialist Vance believes in the collectivization of white baby production. Production, not support Bernardo de La Paz Oct 1 #41

Robert McBurney For the Supreme Court malaise Oct 1 #45

This is beautiful ... n/t wackadoo wabbit Oct 1 #46

Wow. Beautifully said. Betty Boom Oct 1 #47

Not a Republican, I'm guessing. Morbius Oct 1 #52