Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
40. It takes energy to remove carbon
Sun Oct 27, 2024, 11:01 AM
Oct 27

Carbon removal will be seized on by the oiligarchs as an excuse to keep polluting.

It's far more effective to just leave it in the ground.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R malaise Oct 23 #1
But...but....Kamala did not give interviews...and Hillary had e-mails... Moostache Oct 23 #2
And people would rather have a beer with George Bush than with Al Gore. LisaM Oct 23 #5
And despite this information the MAGA and GOP assholes keep merrily dancing around saying hadEnuf Oct 23 #19
Sigh ... and I would have always preferred that beer with Gore. RandomNumbers Oct 27 #41
The price of eggs is too high. Klarkashton Oct 28 #51
I've been muttering for years that PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 23 #3
More accurately perhaps, life as humanity knows it will be in deep doo-doo. Magoo48 Oct 23 #12
The obscenely rich are addicted to profits, orthoclad Oct 27 #39
I'm worried about all of the methane gas that will be released when the Arctic permafrost melts. OMGWTF Oct 23 #20
They have some Metaphorical Oct 24 #26
Do not need to worry about the planet. The planet as you mention will take care of itself. LiberalArkie Oct 24 #35
Wow. This is probably the most important article of the year. ananda Oct 23 #4
And I'm ,out of respect,not gonna make a smart ass remark. BattleRow Oct 23 #13
There is another Delphinus Oct 23 #6
K&R x 1,000,000 c-rational Oct 23 #7
This has been known since the early 2000s relayerbob Oct 23 #8
Is it finally time for the carbon eaters? Coexist Oct 23 #9
ppl cd kill their lawns. mopinko Oct 24 #25
It takes energy to remove carbon orthoclad Oct 27 #40
Sadly this will not get the attention it deserves. The world will suffer. live love laugh Oct 23 #10
we are saying goodbye et tu Oct 23 #11
Maybe it is getting ready to say goodbye to us Stuckinthebush Oct 23 #15
true nt et tu Oct 23 #18
The current has been slowing for some time now Warpy Oct 23 #14
the fog may clear et tu Oct 23 #17
Oh, I'm not that gloomy Warpy Oct 23 #21
Yes but extrapolating a collapse from thousands of years ago moniss Oct 24 #33
First, you can't predict it Warpy Oct 24 #36
You miss the point entirely.nt moniss Oct 24 #37
Humans might revert to lithic hunter-gatherers orthoclad Oct 27 #43
That's usually who manages to survive any major collapse Warpy Oct 27 #44
Usually? The spcies has never seen a collapse like the one approaching. orthoclad Oct 27 #45
The one around 1177-186 (the date changes constantly) BC comes very close Warpy Oct 27 #46
No comparison. The global biosphere didn't collapse. orthoclad Oct 28 #48
That's just it, we don't know what happened to erase civilizations over such a wide area Warpy Oct 28 #49
You miss my point orthoclad Oct 28 #50
You missed my last sentences. Warpy Oct 28 #52
Mutual. Gotcha. orthoclad Oct 28 #53
Oct 23, south-central KY, 86F on my porch. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 23 #16
We're in the same neighborhood in KY Bayard Oct 23 #22
Well that's terrifying. JanMichael Oct 24 #32
89 the forecast high for 10/24 here in Missouri . . . hatrack Oct 24 #28
Just.... Clouds Passing Oct 23 #23
Kick Duppers Oct 24 #24
K&R Think. Again. Oct 24 #27
Stop Global Whining czarjak Oct 24 #29
K&R Wild blueberry Oct 24 #30
On the Gulf Coast.... surfered Oct 24 #31
If the system of Atlantic currents collapses mn9driver Oct 24 #34
Excellent point that gets ignored orthoclad Oct 28 #54
Kick Duppers Oct 24 #38
Jesus will save us dalton99a Oct 27 #42
There is also the danger of stagnation. Morbius Oct 28 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Key Atlantic current coul...»Reply #40