Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SeanHG

(71 posts)
44. Find your State's National Popular Vote organization
Mon Oct 28, 2024, 10:06 AM
Oct 28

and get involved. Once enough States have signed onto the referendum to equal 270 EC electors, the EC will be kneecapped, and all without a Constitutional Amendment (which we all know is impossible with the current Minority Rule we're living under).

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes! SalamanderSleeps Oct 28 #1
I second that. OLDMDDEM Oct 28 #28
And they can start by eliminating the 1929 Permanent Apportionment Act Charging Triceratops Oct 28 #34
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes !!! ! ! ! !!!!! !!!! !!!! !!!! Trueblue1968 Oct 28 #73
Not only that bucolic_frolic Oct 28 #2
The Senate must be changed wiseowljedi Oct 28 #30
add Daylight Savings Time to that list RainCaster Oct 28 #82
It absolutely should be abolished, but good luck making it happen. tinrobot Oct 28 #3
Which is why it is set up that way. thatdemguy Oct 28 #47
It's not true that "smaller states" wouldn't have their voices heard. Land doesn't vote. Their voters still vote. themaguffin Oct 28 #4
And they have the same representation in the Senate as larger states. Lonestarblue Oct 28 #27
Yes, but it will have to be done by Constitutional amendment, Ocelot II Oct 28 #5
It's strange we went through the whole 20th century without the electoral college and the popular vote not matching Walleye Oct 28 #6
Yes. We have been working toward it for 20 years. RedSpartan Oct 28 #7
⬆️⬆️⬆️THIS⬆️⬆️⬆️ Think. Again. Oct 28 #14
The reason the Supreme Court is now mostly unethical- DeeDeeNY Oct 28 #23
Only extreme measures can end entrenched minority rule Charging Triceratops Oct 28 #35
Can't rec this enough RANDYWILDMAN Oct 28 #80
And imagine if your in a state thatdemguy Oct 28 #48
Those smaller states Bettie Oct 28 #8
Yes! SocialDemocrat61 Oct 28 #9
Yes, of course, but it will be challenging to make it happen. NNadir Oct 28 #10
2nd amendment is also a relic of slavery Jerry2144 Oct 28 #54
I hadn't thought of it that way, but it makes sense. NNadir Oct 28 #61
That makes no sense T all Ontheboundry Oct 28 #70
YES Faux pas Oct 28 #11
Yes. Those in smaller states do get their voices heard via their vote, just like everyone else In It to Win It Oct 28 #12
Of course people in smaller states will have their voices heard... Think. Again. Oct 28 #13
This is what the Founders thought DeeDeeNY Oct 28 #20
We have tons of info on candidates without them having to campaign anywhere travelingthrulife Oct 28 #22
Any candidate would still have to reach as many voters.... Think. Again. Oct 28 #25
Is it really that much different than the current situation? misanthrope Oct 28 #74
I honestly feel that my vote doesn't count DeeDeeNY Oct 28 #15
It's not just a feeling--it's a fact hawkeye21 Oct 29 #91
It's outlived it usefulness for slave states years ago. Emile Oct 28 #16
No DeepWinter Oct 28 #17
You're ignoring the tyranny of the minority Charging Triceratops Oct 28 #37
It does exactly the opposite of what you said jcgoldie Oct 28 #41
absolutely if..fish..had..wings Oct 28 #18
Republicans were ready to do away with it when Emile Oct 28 #19
Not eliminate, but reformulate the EC. cloudbase Oct 28 #21
Can't each state already do that on their own? misanthrope Oct 28 #76
That's why something like that would have to be imposed through federal legislation. cloudbase Oct 28 #83
"Winner take all" rules should be abolished, at a minimum. CoopersDad Oct 28 #24
I lived in NE for over 20 years and wondered why all states didn't award their EC RubyRose Oct 28 #85
Yes, no doubt. walkingman Oct 28 #26
Absolutely. Voltaire2 Oct 28 #29
Yes, and this is from the granddaughter of an Elector in 1936. Boomerproud Oct 28 #31
Yes. I am from a smallsh state. BoomaofBandM Oct 28 #32
Abolishing the Electoral College will take decades, but the Maine/Nebraska model is not bad WSHazel Oct 28 #33
How the Electoral College Was Nearly Abolished in 1970. (published in 2020) usonian Oct 28 #36
Southern lawmakers bdamomma Oct 28 #45
Why bother with the 60-vote filibuster? Polybius Oct 28 #69
In 1970, it would have been mostly a distinction without a difference, the threshold for cloture was 67 tritsofme Oct 28 #71
Of course, and obviously. Been talking about it at least since 2000. msfiddlestix Oct 28 #38
wouldnt have their voices heard? jcgoldie Oct 28 #39
As a Californian my voice is never heard. The Electoral College needs to go. Beaverhausen Oct 28 #40
It should never have existed in the first place. DavidDvorkin Oct 28 #42
Yes bdamomma Oct 28 #43
Find your State's National Popular Vote organization SeanHG Oct 28 #44
attaching this article bdamomma Oct 28 #46
It won't be changed until the Repugs bdjhawk Oct 28 #49
It sure hasn't prevented what it was for. Blue Full Moon Oct 28 #50
As long as the senate overrepresents small states they will be heard JT45242 Oct 28 #51
Yes I am sick of 3 years campaigns kimbutgar Oct 28 #52
Yes. moondust Oct 28 #53
Virtually impossible to abolish. The popular vote compact would fix it though. bullimiami Oct 28 #55
Yes. kairos12 Oct 28 #56
It's just awful minority rule. NCDem47 Oct 28 #57
YES AmBlue Oct 28 #58
Yes. But a Constitutional convention to change it -- in this era -- might leave us worse off than we are. Silent Type Oct 28 #59
The question is how to be able to do it. diane in sf Oct 28 #60
It was outdated a hundred years ago. bif Oct 28 #62
'Without it, those in smaller states wouldn't have their voices heard." J_William_Ryan Oct 28 #63
Yes BlueKota Oct 28 #64
YES! 1WorldHope Oct 28 #65
Tim Walz says yes DeeDeeNY Oct 28 #66
Yes , by all means. republianmushroom Oct 28 #67
Currently, only 7 states matter. Funtatlaguy Oct 28 #68
Of course Stargleamer Oct 28 #72
Hell,yes! Why should it matter where in the hell ya live? One person, one vote. Geography should have no say. hawkeye21 Oct 28 #75
No Zeitghost Oct 28 #77
YES YES YES YES YES Brainstormy Oct 28 #78
ASAP... We have to stop making the same mistake only JCMach1 Oct 28 #79
The Senate is Too Heavily Embedded to change Metaphorical Oct 28 #81
Yes LetMyPeopleVote Oct 28 #84
Yes how many other developed countries have such a bullshit procedure? Dem4life1234 Oct 28 #86
yes, after i learned it was for slave states. pansypoo53219 Oct 29 #87
of course it should be abolished Skittles Oct 29 #88
Hell yeah The Third Doctor Oct 29 #89
Whenever a Republican tells me we need term limits, I reply Emile Oct 29 #90
It would take the fun out of this: Polybius Oct 29 #92
Let's look at the last 32 years Baggies Oct 29 #93
Yes as soon as it is possible ArnoldLayne Oct 29 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the Electoral Coll...»Reply #44