Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nevilledog

(53,354 posts)
Wed Oct 30, 2024, 12:00 PM Oct 30

The Supreme Court Just Carved an Outrageous Loophole Into a Major Voting Rights Law [View all]

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/10/us-presidential-election-supreme-court-virginia-voter-rolls-purge.html

The Supreme Court decided Wednesday that at least 1,600 people—including some known to be U.S. citizens with every right to vote—can be removed from Virginia’s voter rolls before Election Day. The conservative supermajority’s order, issued on the shadow docket, essentially nullified a landmark federal law that bars last-minute voter purges. All three liberal justices dissented. Ominously, the court’s intervention signals to other states that they can commence purges at the eleventh hour, suppressing the vote through legal gamesmanship that Congress sought to ban.

Wednesday’s order is a major victory for Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General Jason Miyares, both Republicans, in their quest to expand states’ authority to cancel voter registrations just before voting begins. And it’s a clear violation of federal law. A federal statute, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, outlawed any state “program” that “systematically” removes “ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters” starting 90 days before a federal election. Congress enacted the statute in recognition of the obvious fact that these purges often caught up eligible voters, as well, creating confusion and threatening civil rights. Nonetheless, Youngkin issued an executive order exactly 90 days before the Nov. 5 election mandating a daily set of voter purges.

Youngkin claimed that the program went after only noncitizens. But he was lying: His program swept in U.S. citizens in two ways. First, it targeted Virginians who checked a box on a DMV form indicating that they were noncitizens. But due to poor design of this form, a startlingly large number of citizens inadvertently check this box. Moreover, many foreign nationals who checked the box years ago have since become naturalized U.S. citizens who may, of course, vote like any other citizen. Second, Youngkin’s program compared the names of alleged noncitizens on the voter rolls with a database of noncitizens maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. It then removed voters whose names purportedly appeared in the database. But this database is, by the government’s own admission, incomplete and imperfect, and comparing its list with a state’s voter rolls can easily lead to false matches.

These flaws are not speculation: Reporters have already found U.S. citizens caught up in Youngkin’s purge, to their immense surprise. Attorneys opposing the program have also identified a number of citizens flagged for removal by the purge. If these citizens want to vote, they’ll now need to reregister at the polls (if they bring the proper documentation), cast a provisional ballot, and hope officials decide to count it.

*snip*
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
f**k the thugs on this disgraceful SC. The best way to show your views about them is to VOTE in huge numbers for Harris JohnSJ Oct 30 #1
Congress needs to expand from 90 days to 180 days. jimfields33 Oct 30 #9
What congress does MEANS NOTHING to this supreme court!!! Until all of us democrats finally realize this, BComplex Oct 30 #20
The Court needs to be expanded or these schmucks impeached. They are all guilty of perjury, some of taking bribes, diane in sf Oct 30 #2
This very decision is, in itself, insurrection IMHO /nt dickthegrouch Oct 30 #12
Republicans believe in "might makes right" DSandra Oct 30 #25
I agree I_UndergroundPanther Oct 30 #32
Let's do both MurrayDelph Oct 31 #35
+1, there are 13 court of appeals there should be 13 justices uponit7771 Oct 31 #36
ok then MI and PA RJ_MacReady Oct 30 #3
Rethugs win by assuming Dems are better. TommyT139 Oct 30 #28
I expect an avalanche of purges now. live love laugh Oct 30 #4
I thought I read a western PA county purged a bunch of registrations durablend Oct 30 #14
Disgraceful ruling yes, but maybe not as bad as it seems Jersey Devil Oct 30 #5
It potentially affects less than one tenth of one percent of Virginia voters ScratchCat Oct 30 #7
Like so many other things it markodochartaigh Oct 30 #16
It is concerning that other states may follow Virginia's example mymomwasright Oct 30 #30
They decided this with no published rationale. It's arrogant and insulting. Ramsey Barner Oct 30 #6
This appears to be part of a larger rightwing plan of some kind.... Think. Again. Oct 30 #8
Fortunately, it looks like anyone who is purged -- but still shows up at polls -- can still vote provisionally. Silent Type Oct 30 #10
The 6 are never going to stop destroying democracy. Passages Oct 30 #11
Charge Youngkin and the six rightwing SC "justices" with Civil Rights violations DFW Oct 30 #13
How about RICO? BattleRow Oct 30 #22
Probably harder to prove the collusion even if we know it was there n/t DFW Oct 30 #26
Throw it up against the wall,and see what sticks! BattleRow Oct 30 #27
We can all give thanks to Leonard Leo, who is the billionaire PARASITE behind the PatrickforB Oct 30 #15
I wish I_UndergroundPanther Oct 30 #33
F*** F*** F*** !!! liberalla Oct 30 #17
Remember when SCOTUS gutted the Voting Rights Act? I guess the Sleazy Six think their work is not done. Hekate Oct 30 #18
I hope we take Figarosmom Oct 30 #19
so what is the loophole? im so confused. Native Oct 30 #21
Is the Supremacy Clause an outlier in the "Originalist" mindset? Mblaze Oct 30 #23
Provisional ballots are called "placebo ballots" by Thom Hartmann, they hardly ever get counted DSandra Oct 30 #24
Of course the timing Dem4life1234 Oct 30 #29
They will I_UndergroundPanther Oct 30 #31
All voters are equal BWdem4life Oct 31 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Supreme Court Just Ca...