Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fearless

(18,458 posts)

17. It has been removed yes

Reply to TwilightZone (Reply #11)

Thu Nov 7, 2024, 07:39 PM

Nov 7

However you are incorrect. It does require the truth to be told in news media. It didn't exist to ensure that lies were told in the media. That would be counterintuitive. It existed to require that the truth was present in news media. You can't, constitutionally, ban them from lying. You can make it legally reprehensible if they do (Dominion is a good example of this). But freedom of speech should not be infringed upon.

An updated version of the Fairness Doctrine is vital to the legitimacy and viability of news media in the 21st Century.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does the Democratic Party want to survive? [View all] Fearless Nov 7 OP

There won't be anymore elections Missmellyminx Nov 7 #1

Yep, isn't all this republican job now? LisaL Nov 7 #4

This is fearmongering Fearless Nov 7 #5

This is hyperbole. TwilightZone Nov 7 #10

You really believe that? atreides1 Nov 8 #31

We will............. Lovie777 Nov 7 #2

Agree with 90%. Elessar Zappa Nov 7 #3

It was legally required to provide fair coverage Fearless Nov 7 #6

Cynical Me sez the Reichtwingers would just as soon abolish the Electoral College Montauk6 Nov 7 #8

There is no set "right wing" Fearless Nov 7 #12

The FL rule isn't arbitrary. TwilightZone Nov 7 #14

The number 60% is arbitrary. Fearless Nov 7 #16

They have no reason to. TwilightZone Nov 7 #13

I don't intend on getting the Republican party's support Fearless Nov 7 #19

The Fairness Doctrine had nothing to do with truth. TwilightZone Nov 7 #11

It has been removed yes Fearless Nov 7 #17

The Fairness Doctrine never had anything to do with truth in broadcasting. TwilightZone Nov 7 #20

The Democratic Party's paradox? slumcamper Nov 7 #7

We are ForgedCrank Nov 7 #9

I agree with you 100 percent and have been stressing all the issues Jspur Nov 7 #15

This... Fearless Nov 7 #18

TLDR, went for bacon/potato chips instead Nimble_Idea Nov 7 #21

Sounds like socialism LiberaBlueDem Nov 7 #22

DEADLINE WHITEHOUSE uncovers REAL REASON Why Kamala Lost - Nicole Wallace MSNBC revealing Insights LetMyPeopleVote Nov 7 #23

I agree with virtually all of this EdmondDantes_ Nov 7 #24

100% Blue Full Moon Nov 8 #25

None of your points make any difference ibegurpard Nov 8 #26

K&R Docreed2003 Nov 8 #27

Democrats vote during hard economic times bucolic_frolic Nov 8 #28

And the Blue-Green divide should end jfz9580m Nov 8 #29

We need to break through to the Gaza protest clowns who are responsible wolfie001 Nov 8 #30

Add the right to make decisions about one's own body Freddie Nov 8 #32

Yeah jfz9580m Nov 8 #33

Or any woman so she can control her own body Freddie Nov 8 #35

Well yeah jfz9580m Nov 9 #36

Spare me. Let's blame the rape victim for the rape. JFC. Where in the hell have you been. The Democrats have been JohnSJ Nov 8 #34

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the Democratic Party...»Reply #17