Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onenote

(44,854 posts)

3. So does this mean that there might have been something meritorious in Trump's claims?

Reply to Doodley (Original post)

Sat Nov 9, 2024, 11:33 AM

Nov 9

I'm being sarcastic, but it seems like folks are glomming onto the same sorts of arguments that we all ridiculed when Trump made them.

For example, I've seen it suggested that its suspicious that Harris lost states with Democratic governors. Well, Trump lost a couple of states with Republican governors. So it seems like an odd fact to claim as proof of fraud.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Prof. Alex Halderman: Hacking the Vote: It's Easier Than You Think. Attacks can spread from machine to machine. [View all] Doodley Nov 9 OP

This should be front page news... 2naSalit Nov 9 #1

Tarrant County uses touchscreens, but we receive a blank paper ballot MagickMuffin Nov 9 #2

Yes, but if nobody checks whether these scanners counted the votes correctly, how would we know? LisaL Nov 9 #5

So does this mean that there might have been something meritorious in Trump's claims? onenote Nov 9 #3

Both these arguments are from before 2020, so yes, these are the arguments Trump made 4 years ago muriel_volestrangler Nov 9 #7

This point needs to be made Dem4life1234 Nov 9 #4

Exit polls are rough checks on actual votes. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 9 #6