Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Garland spent 4 years prosecuting the low hanging fruit for Jan 6th [View all]LaMouffette
(2,294 posts)54. You're right, of course. A potential civil war is most likely why our Dem leaders have not been publicly demanding a
recount or an investigation, even though the results were so astonishingly contrary to our level of excitement and enthusiasm and fundraising for Harris-Walz.
Still, even Rachel Maddow has been raising questions and pointing out certain bizarre things:
[
Why, indeed, would Trump repeatedly tell his voters that they didn't need to vote and that he had plenty of votes?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So Garland spent 4 years prosecuting the low hanging fruit for Jan 6th [View all]
boston bean
Nov 11
OP
The new administration, I'm sure, considers it a resounding success. So there's that.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#1
I have anger right now scriv! I am angry with democrats and its pretty close to top of list.
boston bean
Nov 11
#2
I am so numb, I'm not even feeling the anger. I imagine it will come later. But
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#3
I am not familiar with 457s, but my old 401K allowed me to put money in a few different
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#42
Yes, but the Constitution is a musty old document that hasn't been defined over the centuries
bucolic_frolic
Nov 11
#5
You must be psychic! Because there it is!!! On the bright side, there are only two of them.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#46
they need to start feeding him bullshit. the spy movies call it 'a blue dye test'
mopinko
Nov 11
#36
Think D-Day would have been a success if allied forces attacked on only one beach with no air support?
Hotler
Nov 11
#13
If Trump had a beard and turban and slightly darky skin on J6 you're saying the DOJ would've not changed anything in ...
uponit7771
Nov 11
#71
" most effective defense, though isn't his skin color, " this is false on its face, you know it too
uponit7771
Nov 11
#95
Second runner-up: "But emptywheel says everything is going as it should. And that's PROOF." Sigh.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#45
Still trying to sell that Garland was the greatest thing since sliced bread, I see.
republianmushroom
Nov 11
#78
Sooo if Trump had a full beard and a turban and slightly darker skin on J6 and said his words you're claiming the DOJ
uponit7771
Nov 11
#72
The mealy mouthed, milquetoast attitude with these fascists has gotten us wiped out.
hadEnuf
Nov 11
#41
A week before the election, I posted my opinion that when Kamala won the presidency she should replace Garland with
LaMouffette
Nov 11
#50
You're right, of course. A potential civil war is most likely why our Dem leaders have not been publicly demanding a
LaMouffette
Nov 11
#54
I do not think Trump will pardon them as he considers them losers for getting caught much like
LiberalArkie
Nov 11
#51
None of that means anything if the top guy gets off scot free to LET THEM OUT OF JAIL
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#89
Garland had YEARS and knew all about the timeline. The threat of re-election was always there.
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#91
yeah Im getting a clue that maybe he totally failed - its just a hunch though...
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#94
history, if we still report history years on, garland will go down as one of the main players that helped destroy
Javaman
Nov 11
#83