So Garland spent 4 years prosecuting the low hanging fruit for Jan 6th

[bigtree]

70. she provided more than this post of yours in detail about the investigation

Last edited Mon Nov 11, 2024, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)

...for anyone who bothered to read, she never assures anyone of anything that might happen to Trump before the election.

She left that to people insisting that Biden's Justice Dept, absolutely must win the election for everyone by rushing into court with... what? All of that effort to win the election for Trump's rival in the race. What was it that we're expecting to prosecute Trump for again?

Something about using his office to interfere in a presidentiaal election? How does it square all of that concern if you're hollering at DOJ to win the election for you?

Something someone saw on teevee, or something some reporter who doesn't have any more access to those details outside of court filings and perps spilling their beans, isn't describing a real prosecution, or even one that's actually happened. They're describing a fantasy one.

But critics who actually know the law, must be asking themselves quietly how Any conviction was supposed to stop a candidate already convicted of 34 counts of felony election fraud, especially since no charge or conviction prevents anyone from running for president and getting elected, even from jail.

What a silly exercise in avoidance of the facts, and what a a deep contradiction of concern.