Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Garland spent 4 years prosecuting the low hanging fruit for Jan 6th [View all]bigtree
(90,287 posts)86. but he doesn't
...his most effective defense, though isn't his skin color, but the endless funds he has to wage endless appeals.
Same with his co-conspirators and others who were eventually forced to testify by Garland's successful fights in several, successive appeals courts with multiple judges who set the hearing dates, often delaying action and decisions in concert with the obstructive challenges to things like privilege and standing.
Whatever you wrote there is your own invention, which I'm taking no responsibility at all for resolving.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So Garland spent 4 years prosecuting the low hanging fruit for Jan 6th [View all]
boston bean
Nov 11
OP
The new administration, I'm sure, considers it a resounding success. So there's that.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#1
I have anger right now scriv! I am angry with democrats and its pretty close to top of list.
boston bean
Nov 11
#2
I am so numb, I'm not even feeling the anger. I imagine it will come later. But
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#3
I am not familiar with 457s, but my old 401K allowed me to put money in a few different
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#42
Yes, but the Constitution is a musty old document that hasn't been defined over the centuries
bucolic_frolic
Nov 11
#5
You must be psychic! Because there it is!!! On the bright side, there are only two of them.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#46
they need to start feeding him bullshit. the spy movies call it 'a blue dye test'
mopinko
Nov 11
#36
Think D-Day would have been a success if allied forces attacked on only one beach with no air support?
Hotler
Nov 11
#13
If Trump had a beard and turban and slightly darky skin on J6 you're saying the DOJ would've not changed anything in ...
uponit7771
Nov 11
#71
" most effective defense, though isn't his skin color, " this is false on its face, you know it too
uponit7771
Nov 11
#95
Second runner-up: "But emptywheel says everything is going as it should. And that's PROOF." Sigh.
Scrivener7
Nov 11
#45
Still trying to sell that Garland was the greatest thing since sliced bread, I see.
republianmushroom
Nov 11
#78
Sooo if Trump had a full beard and a turban and slightly darker skin on J6 and said his words you're claiming the DOJ
uponit7771
Nov 11
#72
The mealy mouthed, milquetoast attitude with these fascists has gotten us wiped out.
hadEnuf
Nov 11
#41
A week before the election, I posted my opinion that when Kamala won the presidency she should replace Garland with
LaMouffette
Nov 11
#50
You're right, of course. A potential civil war is most likely why our Dem leaders have not been publicly demanding a
LaMouffette
Nov 11
#54
I do not think Trump will pardon them as he considers them losers for getting caught much like
LiberalArkie
Nov 11
#51
None of that means anything if the top guy gets off scot free to LET THEM OUT OF JAIL
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#89
Garland had YEARS and knew all about the timeline. The threat of re-election was always there.
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#91
yeah Im getting a clue that maybe he totally failed - its just a hunch though...
Blues Heron
Nov 11
#94
history, if we still report history years on, garland will go down as one of the main players that helped destroy
Javaman
Nov 11
#83