General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Retired Major General Paul Eaton Issues A Chilling Warning [View all]jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Never-the-less, is it not incumbent upon the president to safeguard and secure the nation against all enemies foreign and domestic? It all comes down to how the definition of enemy is wielded. For instance, I have no doubt that Trump will wield that accusation with impunity and persecute (with wholesale disregard to the rule of law) anyone he doesn't like. Do you doubt that?
I get it, we need to stay as close as possible within the boundaries of the law. This is new territory. Still, the option to do nothing is a horrendous and avoidable acquiescence to the certainty of domestic terrorism upon American citizens by their own government. First constitutional right to go (or at least what's left of it) will be the right to peaceful assembly. Do you or any thoughtful person doubt that?