Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Letter from cybersecurity experts about hand counting and 2024 election anomalies [View all]AkFemDem
(2,194 posts)171. Okay so you do value the "recs"
Just not enough to use them rather than essentially type "rec" after every post you like ok gotcha.
Are you asking why I did not "rec" this? I am stingy with my recs, they're glorious little prizes I give away sparingly. In this case, I don't agree with the logic of the content the poster shared. I actually explained my reasoning for that in a response in this thread (rather than posting -1zzzz or whatever, haha)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
286 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Letter from cybersecurity experts about hand counting and 2024 election anomalies [View all]
Loupe Garoue
Nov 14
OP
"We have no evidence that the outcomes of the elections in those states were actually compromised"
speak easy
Nov 14
#5
But you said you answered all my questions, where are the audit and recount results...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#55
I have been painstakingly clear that I am only calling for verification of the first-count results...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#67
A paper trail that you don't think any regular citizen should get to inspect
questionseverything
Nov 15
#251
No matter what you say, a thousand people could watch a machine spit out a results tape
questionseverything
Nov 15
#256
You don't acknowledge that the system is non transparent or that American citizens have a right to oversee the
questionseverything
Nov 16
#269
The difference being, we the American people have a right to oversee our elections
questionseverything
Nov 14
#32
They usually need some evidence that a crime was in fact committed before investigating
Kaleva
Nov 15
#177
Well, when you investigate concerns THAT''S when you usually uncover whatever evidence there is!!
ElementaryPenguin
Nov 14
#92
If American citizens are not allowed to see the actual counting of votes,
questionseverything
Nov 15
#246
To my way of thinking, AFTER witnessing what TFG WILL DO in our countrys future
bluestarone
Nov 14
#14
Kamala lost the election fair & square. Just as Trump did in 2020. Enough said. n/t
Jacson6
Nov 14
#18
In response to your "wild speculation" claim, I guess it's okay to just post this again...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#66
Elias didn't seem to think bomb scares all over Democratic strongholds were a huge problem
questionseverything
Nov 15
#255
(psssttt... some of the first-counts aren't even done yet and audits also take a little time)
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#48
I agree, let's go straight to recounts and get whatever proof there may be.
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#72
I don't see why I appear "desperate" to you when all I'm doing is replying to other posters.
Think. Again.
Nov 15
#265
That should be standard practice with anything as important as public office elections...
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#279
Ye, that evidence is "discovered" through investigations, like the recounts that are being called for.
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#285
It is ABSOLUTELY essential that the Harris/Walz campaign audit votes, but the software needs to be forensically
BComplex
Nov 15
#150
How do we know that the Harris campaign hasn't picked up things with their own data?
Jarqui
Nov 15
#222
Greg Palast thinks that provisional ballots were the key, with over 2 million tossed.
TheRickles
Nov 15
#204