Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should DU demand a recount? [View all]Abnredleg
(934 posts)13. Non binding does not mean ignore
As has been pointed out before. It just means that it triggers further action such as a full recount or a criminal investigation. Its nonbinding because the audits are based on sampling so you have to take further steps to confirm any potential problems. The elections in the swing states are run by Dems except for GA so why would it be ignored? Either the state officials or citizens can take it to court and prevent certification if there was fraud. Dont forget, courts have a lot of leeway to act in these situations.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here is a map of which states hold their audits as binding on the outcome...
Think. Again.
Saturday
#16
The rules and regulations, and processes, for audits vary from state to state...
Think. Again.
Saturday
#19
I don't want random audits: I want full audits, and hand counts of all the ballots in the states that trump won.
BComplex
Saturday
#21
Even if the Daily Kos article was bullshit, and maybe taken down from the site, or whatever, it still does not
BComplex
Saturday
#22
Please correct your title, the CISA has NOT made any statement about this conclusion.
Think. Again.
Saturday
#56
And here is yet another letter sent to Harris from cybersecurity experts...
Think. Again.
Saturday
#5
When was that statement made? Was it before the evidence we're discussing surfaced?
Think. Again.
Saturday
#39
Marc Elias swears that this election was legit. He is not accounting for the very specific targets that
BComplex
Saturday
#24
Only 29 states have laws binding their electors to vote according to the popular vote
EX500rider
Saturday
#38
The only reference I've seen was an estimate of 600,000 spread among the swing states.
Think. Again.
Saturday
#61
I just wrote to Biden, and Harris for them to ask for recounts in the Swing States, and why.
electric_blue68
Saturday
#69
I was finally able to retrieve a non-paywall link to the Daily Koz article...
Think. Again.
Saturday
#54