Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should DU demand a recount? [View all]MadameButterfly
(2,300 posts)65. Look at whatever Trump is accusing us of and that's what he is doing
Given that his whole campaign has been about planning the steal, while playing a lot of golf, do we think he wouldn't have explore every avenue including hacking voting machines? If it's possible as a couple of letters state, then I'll bet he tried it. Whether he succeeded is another story. What is maddening is we are supposed to prove the fraud before we can investigate the evidence.
And quelling our fears is not sufficient cause for a recount, even though this might be that last real election ever.
If the election was honest, Republicans shouldn't object to a recount. It would just cement their win and quash any accusations or conspiracies theories against them. But you know they'd fight it tooth and nail.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here is a map of which states hold their audits as binding on the outcome...
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#16
The rules and regulations, and processes, for audits vary from state to state...
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#19
I don't want random audits: I want full audits, and hand counts of all the ballots in the states that trump won.
BComplex
Nov 16
#21
Even if the Daily Kos article was bullshit, and maybe taken down from the site, or whatever, it still does not
BComplex
Nov 16
#22
Please correct your title, the CISA has NOT made any statement about this conclusion.
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#56
When was that statement made? Was it before the evidence we're discussing surfaced?
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#39
Marc Elias swears that this election was legit. He is not accounting for the very specific targets that
BComplex
Nov 16
#24
Only 29 states have laws binding their electors to vote according to the popular vote
EX500rider
Nov 16
#38
The only reference I've seen was an estimate of 600,000 spread among the swing states.
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#61
I just wrote to Biden, and Harris for them to ask for recounts in the Swing States, and why.
electric_blue68
Nov 16
#69
I was finally able to retrieve a non-paywall link to the Daily Koz article...
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#54