About Those Bullet Ballots

[Sympthsical]

58. At this point, I'd like the guy the poster is repeating to show his work

But he's being awfully spiky about it and highly selective about what little he is willing to share. He's heavy on claims, shallow on producing hard data that can be examined with methodologies replicated. You know, what science and math do.

He's been asked, directly, multiple times to share where he's pulling information. He hasn't. He talks around it and implies things without saying anything concrete that can be grasped.

Does that strike you as someone operating in wholly good faith? If this is all true, and he already did all the calculations, just drop the data. He should have it all organized already. Just hit "post" on substack and let people go through it.

The fact he blatantly avoids doing this when asked should raise all the flags.

It's credulity sprung from wish-making.