Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
The rather pathetic arguments that the Attorney General of the United States RockRaven Tuesday #1
DOJ policy didn't stop Bobby Kennedy from going after Hoffa John Shaft Tuesday #15
He violated DOJ policy edhopper Tuesday #45
for whatever reason, they are addicted to him Skittles Tuesday #2
Had to change my position on him IzzaNuDay Tuesday #3
I have sure changed my opinion and i echo you Trueblue1968 Tuesday #4
Yes, the rightwing is done with him... Think. Again. Tuesday #5
He's served his purpose. Scrivener7 Tuesday #18
Extremely well... Think. Again. Tuesday #21
That's what Rebl2 Tuesday #43
thank you Skittles Tuesday #64
Milquetoast Merrick RJ_MacReady Tuesday #6
This message was self-deleted by its author RandiFan1290 Tuesday #7
I lost patience with him three and half years ago. Emile Tuesday #8
There is simply no excuse on the planet for the foot dragging & to let this go unaccounted for. CrispyQ Tuesday #27
I agree. There is no excuse for allowing that. yardwork Tuesday #56
Your post made me laugh Meowmee Tuesday #80
I don't hate him. Tommy Carcetti Tuesday #9
If Trump has an enemies-revenge list, and I believe he does, Garland is on it. Intractable Tuesday #11
Yes. Tommy Carcetti Tuesday #12
I dont hate him either, but the buck should have stopped there. Failed to defend the US. lostnfound Tuesday #13
He was not desirable as a judge either. He was just what Obama thought the Republicans would TheKentuckian Tuesday #14
Well we are seeing the results John Shaft Tuesday #17
Yes Meowmee Tuesday #82
Yes BigMin28 Tuesday #19
Before Mitch change the rule from 60 votes to simple majority for Supreme Court justices Walleye Tuesday #34
If he had done his job, we'd be in a very different world now. Scrivener7 Tuesday #20
After reading the article cited below, I think Garland is a symptom of a much deeper disease. Intractable Tuesday #10
Sarah Kendzior is a russian-paid troll bigtree Tuesday #23
I guess you didn't read the article. Intractable Tuesday #25
she's literally ragging on President Biden bigtree Tuesday #35
So you didn't read the article? Intractable Tuesday #37
I read the trolling of Democrats, yes. bigtree Tuesday #39
"I don't care what she wrote." Intractable Tuesday #41
you posted a known troll of Democrats trolling Democrats bigtree Tuesday #42
Honestly, you want to know what I think? Do you really? Intractable Tuesday #47
bullshit bigtree Tuesday #49
"Bring some facts to the discussion, " Intractable Tuesday #50
you dance around the facts like they don't exist bigtree Tuesday #53
I started to read this, but then realized you didn't read mine. Enough. Intractable Tuesday #57
oh, I read it. bigtree Tuesday #58
Your irrational love for Garland is evidenced by how easily triggered you are. Intractable Tuesday #59
derision is not an argument bigtree Tuesday #60
That's right. I'm glad you finally understand that subtely. Intractable Tuesday #61
you trolled my response with a known troll of Democrats bigtree Tuesday #62
I am not reading this. Garland is the hill you want to die on. Good bye. Intractable Tuesday #63
'I am not reading this.' bigtree Tuesday #65
I'm sure it's more accurate to say no one here is reading you. Intractable Tuesday #66
you mean I'm not in the cool kids club? bigtree Tuesday #68
Please stop humiliating yourself. Intractable Tuesday #69
first you say no one is reading this bigtree Tuesday #70
I'm sorry that you feel you must do this. You removed yourself from the cool kids by not knowing when to quit. Intractable Tuesday #72
you're repeating yourself bigtree Tuesday #76
Post removed Post removed Tuesday #79
For just one more time, I'd like to hear Garland say "No one is above the law." Intractable Tuesday #81
funny bigtree Wednesday #83
At long last still no sense of shame Ponietz Tuesday #46
The mechanism, I think, is the same as the Scrivener7 Tuesday #16
is there something about not enough Democrats caring to show up to defeat an already convicted criminal bigtree Tuesday #22
Voters witnessed justice denied and stayed home. Emile Tuesday #24
Where'd you get that info? Kaleva Tuesday #31
The critical thing is that Biden keeps him in place. polichick Tuesday #26
Yes. What we think doesn't matter Kaleva Tuesday #30
Biden has Garland's back covered Kaleva Tuesday #28
Post removed Post removed Tuesday #32
Garland's one accomplishment gab13by13 Tuesday #29
Not furious enough to replace him - which only he could do... polichick Tuesday #38
When we don't uphold the rule of law while in power the future is bleak Ponietz Tuesday #33
Were they miscalculations? gab13by13 Tuesday #36
I don't even know anymore Ponietz Tuesday #40
It was deliberate. His best friend is the same person purchasing the Supreme Court. onecaliberal Tuesday #78
I at Rebl2 Tuesday #44
I had that thought also when Biden selected her for VP. I wanted her for AG! Intractable Tuesday #48
Who can say it would be different if a criminal was prosecuted and put in prison instead of running for president? onecaliberal Tuesday #51
45 months and counting, republianmushroom Tuesday #52
As one says, like moths to a flame. No matter what , Garland will be defended whenever Autumn Tuesday #54
pleasantly surprised to see many former fans waking up Skittles Tuesday #67
When nobody in Congress was investigated for J6 a lot of us knew then he was going to do nothing Autumn Tuesday #71
now we will have a seditionist as president, who promises retribution Skittles Tuesday #73
Everybody in our party is going to be blamed at one time or another for him winning. I'm going to blame Autumn Tuesday #74
the media held VP Harris to impossible standards, while holding Trump to no standards at all Skittles Tuesday #75
I think Garlands most ardent defender here is an actual Garland family member. BannonsLiver Tuesday #55
I despise the way he talks and his actions bob4460 Tuesday #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Garland lovers are still ...»Reply #19