Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Qutzupalotl

(15,155 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:20 AM Nov 20

Adam Kinzinger: I served with Tulsi Gabbard and Yikes [View all]

DURING MY TIME IN CONGRESS, I had the privilege of working with all kinds of people from all over the country with different experiences, backgrounds, priorities, ideologies, approaches, strengths, and weaknesses. One of the people I overlapped with was Tulsi Gabbard, whom Donald Trump has announced he intended to nominate to become director of national intelligence (DNI). This role, the top job in America’s huge, powerful, world-beating intelligence-gathering and analysis enterprise, requires someone with steadfast integrity, sound judgment, and an unwavering commitment to the security of the United States.

Gabbard lacks all three qualities.
….

What concerns me most, however, is the amorality apparent in her decision-making. A DNI must be resolute in defending the Constitution, impartial in assessing threats, and unwavering in his or her commitment to American values. Gabbard’s track record suggests she prioritizes personal advancement and political expediency over these critical responsibilities. Her ability to shift loyalties and principles to suit her ambitions is not a trait we need in a position that demands impartiality and integrity.

Trump’s choice of Gabbard for this role is as perplexing as it is dangerous. By selecting someone with no significant intelligence experience and a history of erratic behavior, he is undermining the credibility of one of the most important positions in our national security apparatus—one whose ability not only to uncover and protect secrets but to tell hard truths to people in power is a key asymmetric advantage the United States enjoys over its adversaries. Worse still, Gabbard’s history of promoting authoritarian narratives raises legitimate concerns about her ability to prioritize America’s interests over those of foreign adversaries.


more: https://www.thebulwark.com/p/i-served-with-tulsi-gabbard-and-yikes
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's out of my hands JustAnotherGen Nov 20 #1
That's it right there. This was in the hands of voters in 7 states and not one Maru Kitteh Nov 20 #6
Because in all likelyhood more than one if not all of the 7 swing states had stolen elections. I live in Wisconsin..... usaf-vet Nov 20 #19
The reason they are all close is because some very smart PROGRAMMER wrote the software to do just that...... usaf-vet Nov 20 #24
Surprised there's no parachute to slow down the rocket, save fuel. BadgerKid Nov 20 #36
Just saving the booster is a big mission savings. usaf-vet Nov 20 #44
They weren't close iemanja Nov 21 #57
You are entilted to your own dream. usaf-vet Nov 21 #61
Then there is this. It's not just old guys like me that feel we must audit our election results. usaf-vet Nov 21 #62
"We have no evidence . . . iemanja Nov 21 #63
A big part of that manipulation was a right-wing "think" tank, the Bradley Foundation... keep_left Nov 20 #26
You are right the Wisconsin based Bradley Foundation is part of this remake of Wisconsin and now onto the USA. usaf-vet Nov 20 #29
Citizens United LiberalFighter Nov 20 #48
Legally manipulated is not the same thing as stolen. Maru Kitteh Nov 20 #31
I agree. Unless shown otherwise. Callie1979 Nov 20 #37
so are there studies out NJCher Nov 20 #52
Dems are no slackers when it comes to gerrymandering NJCher Nov 20 #54
You think that's bad- look at Florida. We have a dictator as a Governor. kerry-is-my-prez Nov 20 #40
My consolation will be DENVERPOPS Nov 20 #25
Lower 99.9% Bettie Nov 20 #41
Agreed, DENVERPOPS Nov 20 #43
I heard one of these confused people say "I'll be rich someday and I won't want to pay all these taxes." CTyankee Nov 20 #45
And they don't get it Bettie Nov 20 #49
Your senators get a vote. Qutzupalotl Nov 20 #8
Mine don't need to be called...mercifully I have two liberal Dem Senators! CTyankee Nov 20 #10
Rubio and Scott will be glad to hear my concerns. rubbersole Nov 20 #12
My Senator is Tom Cotton calguy Nov 20 #17
Call anyway. Qutzupalotl Nov 20 #34
YES YES YES YES YES !!!!! Call ANYWAY !!!!! calimary Nov 20 #51
My ONLY contact with my Senator is when they ask for money. usaf-vet Nov 20 #30
That is unfortunate. murielm99 Nov 20 #35
My senators don't care Bettie Nov 20 #42
Asset of a Foreign Adversary Renaissance Man Nov 20 #2
Trump's choice is not perplexing in the least. Irish_Dem Nov 20 #3
Prsident elect Trash didn't pick this cabinet, putinshit did. arthritisR_US Nov 21 #58
I agree. Choices designed to humiliate and destroy the USA. Irish_Dem Nov 21 #59
So I guess Michael Flynn wasn't a big enough traitor Walleye Nov 20 #4
+1 dalton99a Nov 20 #5
You do wonder what he's saving Flynn for. I'm sure we will see him. Maru Kitteh Nov 20 #15
Something that involves the military, no doubt. nt allegorical oracle Nov 20 #16
flynn commands the christian militias - proud boys and such rampartd Nov 20 #32
The Cult wanted him for SecDef! Callie1979 Nov 20 #38
He will be waiting in the wings to take over once she fails (and she will) Nictuku Nov 20 #27
That's the point. Aaeia Nov 20 #7
It's almost like nobody realizes ScratchCat Nov 20 #9
Trump's pick is not at all surprising. Trust_Reality Nov 20 #11
Of course there are... rubbersole Nov 20 #13
It's not perplexing. Stop trying to be politically correct. progressoid Nov 20 #14
Yeah, my first introduction to HER was in 2015 LisaM Nov 20 #18
gabbard was raised as a "hare krishna." rampartd Nov 20 #33
I was hoping for some anecdotal muckraking, but this stuff could, and should, be cut and pasted for all Trumps nominees. jaxexpat Nov 20 #20
O M G!!!! elleng Nov 20 #21
Is it possible that Russian Intelligence asked for her to have that position? patphil Nov 20 #22
Or Pooty himself asked. moondust Nov 20 #23
Post removed Post removed Nov 20 #28
From the OP Title, I thought AZ was recalling serving in the military with her... Montauk6 Nov 20 #39
It's not a perplexing choice. Dementold is choosing hyper-loyal people he knows that he's real comfy with Bernardo de La Paz Nov 20 #46
As Hilary said about her, Gabbard is a Putinista Hassler Nov 20 #47
"Yikes" is right, and perhaps under-stated.. Evolve Dammit Nov 20 #50
Pendejo45 doesn't want to RUN the government, he wants to RUIN the government. ... aggiesal Nov 20 #53
this seems barbtries Nov 20 #55
So Scary... Gabbard is one of Putin's Cha Nov 20 #56
Lack of Jvp Nov 21 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Kinzinger: I served ...