Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RainCaster

(12,257 posts)
Fri Nov 29, 2024, 12:02 AM Nov 2024

Dems need to dump neo-liberal economics [View all]

An opinion piece from The Guardian
The article is a bit longer than what I have shown, well worth thinking about.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/28/the-message-to-democrats-is-clear-you-must-dump-neoliberal-economics

To me, the answer is clear: 40 years of neoliberalism have left the US with unprecedented inequality, stagnation in the middle of the income spectrum (and worse for those below), and declining average life expectancy (highlighted by mounting “deaths of despair”). The American Dream is being killed, and although President Joe Biden and Vice-President Kamala Harris distanced themselves from neoliberalism with their embrace of industrial policies, as representatives of the mainstream establishment, they remained associated with its legacy.

The economics of the moment mattered, but monthly employment and inflation indicators need to be understood in a broader historical context. As the Biden administration stressed on the eve of the election, the economy looks strong, especially compared with others in the G7. But this wasn’t good enough. Americans haven’t forgotten that the Democrats let loose the financial sector (Clinton), then bailed out the banks while homeowners and workers who lost their jobs in the Great Recession carried the cost (Barack Obama). Moreover, it was Clinton who unleashed globalisation, tacitly believing in a trickle-down economics that would ultimately benefit everyone. The only real difference between Democrats and Republicans on this score is that Democrats claimed to feel the pain of those who were losing out.
61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you insist, AND elleng Nov 2024 #1
the easy answer is deregulation and tax cuts rampartd Nov 2024 #14
Nixon coined the phrase "supply side economics" mocking these mostly Orange County Republicans underpants Nov 2024 #28
A quick Google search returned. DiamondShark Nov 2024 #40
It probably means something different to each of us. CoopersDad Nov 2024 #42
DURec leftstreet Nov 2024 #2
So they elected someone who will destroy everything for everyone. Yeah, that makers sense. Not. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #3
And we're gonna hand it all over to them knowing they're going to take a sledge hammer to it. CrispyQ Nov 2024 #32
I'd have them enforce the 14th amendment. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #35
Oh yes, the cut-n-paste scoldings from the empty wheelers. CrispyQ Nov 2024 #36
Yup, empty as fuck. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #44
I am beginning to wonder if articles from the Guardian belong in the Creative Speculation Group. nt taxi Nov 2024 #4
A bit harsh - the author is a former Chief Economist at the World Bank, and a winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics muriel_volestrangler Nov 2024 #17
Then there's the 8-billon pound elephant in the room. CrispyQ Nov 2024 #34
Yea, sometimes a bit harsh. taxi Nov 2024 #50
Every election qazplm135 Nov 2024 #5
That is a a ptretty skewed analysis. It was a joint effort by both parties CentralMass Nov 2024 #6
I always thought (an an Arkansan) that Clinton was Reagan lite LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #9
check the wikipedia on "the washington consensus" rampartd Nov 2024 #15
Bill is a lot like Donald in a lot of ways. Women, and the trend to adlib on stage for hours and the belief that they LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #20
maybe there is a difference between "third way" neoliberalism rampartd Nov 2024 #21
And they both appear to be the same in theory at least. Neither one seems to be in favor of "The Great Society" LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #22
they claim to follow christ rampartd Nov 2024 #23
And none of: LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #26
they don't make kennedys like they used to rampartd Nov 2024 #27
I don't think they make any Democrats like they used to. LiberalArkie Nov 2024 #49
"noblesse oblige" rampartd Nov 2024 #56
We lost, because, Kamala Harris, isn't a white man. Period. Meadowoak Nov 2024 #7
The polling was even worse when it was Biden, as white male as you can get karynnj Nov 2024 #24
The economy is improving, but many people struggling weren't feeling it. Omnipresent Nov 2024 #31
In what world then, is Trump the better candidate? He offered Meadowoak Nov 2024 #57
Desperate people can do stupid things. Omnipresent Nov 2024 #61
Biden is a white man... DiamondShark Nov 2024 #43
Don't bother. Lunabell Nov 2024 #8
You may be right, but if so, we better figure out how to enjoy losing more. New leaders/advisors are needed... dutch777 Nov 2024 #33
There is one small problem Buzz cook Nov 2024 #10
Insult for Democrats ("money in politics" ) but Democrats aren't and won't ever be socialists. betsuni Nov 2024 #11
Thank you. It makes you wonder when its going to sink in Nixie Nov 2024 #19
Yea, But What About My Grocery Bill?!? modrepub Nov 2024 #12
The record number of travelers flying across the country begs to differ. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #45
Yes, absolutely. Can't afford eggs. I still just SMH at this statement. And, I only get eggs a couple of times every SWBTATTReg Nov 2024 #52
They picked it because eggs are expensive. The reason however is bird flu. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #53
When you only buy like 2 dozen eggs over six months like I do, no particular reason why, they are not expensive. SWBTATTReg Nov 2024 #54
I buy a lot of them because my husband is diabetic and we use eggs for his morning protein. Egg whites as well. onecaliberal Nov 2024 #55
Can you point out what part of Biden's economic agenda is neoliberal? Self Esteem Nov 2024 #13
i would rate biden as a keynesian rampartd Nov 2024 #16
I think we need a language campaign Sea A Chell Nov 2024 #18
The word socialist is so thoroughly intertwined with Russian misery and breadlines and oppression summer_in_TX Nov 2024 #60
Yet another crock of baloney. lees1975 Nov 2024 #25
I agree Buckeyeblue Nov 2024 #37
Voters can't connect the dots on Trump let alone going back to Clinton underpants Nov 2024 #29
What is Neo-Liberalism? the_liberal_grandpa Nov 2024 #30
I don't think our wealthy donors would like that, so it would be DOA. jalan48 Nov 2024 #38
He's right except for one thing Ndp5 Nov 2024 #39
Truly incoherent mathematic Nov 2024 #41
Just another billionaire supporting a child rapist and his fascist agenda: onecaliberal Nov 2024 #46
So what is the alternative? What should Clinton and Obama have done? (Real question). LAS14 Nov 2024 #47
It's complicated, just think about all the economic policy that came before them. Passages Nov 2024 #58
THIS malaise Nov 2024 #48
Recommended. H2O Man Nov 2024 #51
Ugh. Not this shit again. Isn't there already a thread on this drivel with Scrivener7 Nov 2024 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dems need to dump neo-lib...