General Discussion

ancianita

(39,939 posts)

13. Absolutely. The facts should be known and shared.

Reply to Unwind Your Mind (Reply #12)

Sun Dec 1, 2024, 11:35 AM

Dec 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unwind Your Mind

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If your wondering why Trudeau flew to Florida to meet with Trump... [View all] Swede Nov 2024 OP

That's a damn shame! Dem4life1234 Nov 2024 #1

The founders never imagined this situation. COL Mustard Dec 2024 #7

I admit I'm a bit ignorant of the law Dem4life1234 Dec 2024 #9

Unfortunately Article II of the Constitution establishes who can be President. COL Mustard Dec 2024 #11

Absolutely! Dem4life1234 Dec 2024 #15

The reality melm00se Dec 2024 #35

Turns out, Nixon actually had it right !!!!!!!!!!! DENVERPOPS Dec 2024 #22

The Democratic party has always let them get away with it... RhapsodyFav Dec 2024 #37

This! Dem4life1234 Dec 2024 #39

Trump will only go to Russia when summoned. 33taw Nov 2024 #2

Trump is considered "criminally inadmissible" to Canada, but he could apply for a "parole" of that status. C0RI0LANUS Nov 2024 #3

i googled and this was the a.i. response: orleans Dec 2024 #40

Thank you for the clarification, orleans. The TRP sounds like the "parole" term I used. C0RI0LANUS Dec 2024 #42

Oh Canada! SNAP! IzzaNuDay Nov 2024 #4

It is true. I Googled it and posted a couple of times. Canada isn't the only country, either Deuxcents Nov 2024 #5

Yeah, but they let Bush and Cheney in. LisaM Nov 2024 #6

Is a DUI a felony though? Polybius Dec 2024 #24

I mostly remember that they wouldn't let you in Canada if you had one. LisaM Dec 2024 #27

As much as I can't stand drinking and driving, a forever ban seems a bit extreme Polybius Dec 2024 #29

The orange one brought the ring to Biden to kiss. That's called professional courtesy. Hotler Dec 2024 #8

... ancianita Dec 2024 #10

Thank you Unwind Your Mind Dec 2024 #12

Absolutely. The facts should be known and shared. ancianita Dec 2024 #13

I'll add my thanks to the above. The vilification of Garland has always struck me as loonacy. EarnestPutz Dec 2024 #14

Empty Wheel? msfiddlestix Dec 2024 #16

What about it? You got fact based info from them? If so, please post it. ancianita Dec 2024 #17

Not I. Just checking my gut impression. I had got a "hit" you might be connected. msfiddlestix Dec 2024 #20

I see. Well, I do have Empty Wheel bookmarked, for sure. ancianita Dec 2024 #21

Well that leaves DOJ and AG off the hook, then. So all we have to do is blame our outdated Constitution msfiddlestix Dec 2024 #19

The Garland DOJ did its job, so why should it even be on the hook? There's WAY more evidence that it shouldn't be at all ancianita Dec 2024 #23

"Nov 18 2022 Garland appoints Jack Smith" Polybius Dec 2024 #25

Thanks for that timeline BDavinciNY Dec 2024 #34

+1, Garland ***COULD HAVE*** assigned an SC first day in office knowing J6 could've been a big deal that involved MAGA uponit7771 Dec 2024 #43

Makes total sense. Emile Dec 2024 #18

It's funny, but it's just trump being himself and enjoying making people squirm and sit at his feet. C Moon Dec 2024 #26

No joke! elleng Dec 2024 #28

I just figured that those Trumpists' wives were thirsty for him, and demanded a meet. LudwigPastorius Dec 2024 #30

Well, probably since the five eyes monitor international phone calls, Trudeau did not want anyone else to know what he LiberalArkie Dec 2024 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2024 #32

"You're" wondering. Spelled correctly in the tweet. Maru Kitteh Dec 2024 #33

Ha! Beautiful! Joinfortmill Dec 2024 #36

Bullshit. Under Canadian law, if the government opts to allow him to enter the country, he can enter the country onenote Dec 2024 #38

stop it! you're spoiling the magic of the moment orleans Dec 2024 #41

I think it was intended as humor. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2024 #44