General Discussion

stillcool

(32,904 posts)

58. It's the entire media conglomeration

Tue Dec 3, 2024, 12:45 PM

Dec 3

is the issue. I read the same article from paper to paper, see it being commentated on from one tv station to another...unless it's local news, and even then, if the story goes national I'll pick up the same vibe. I remember one day I read where MSNBC had labeled Matt Gaetz as a "firebrand". I then noticed the label being used to describe him from one article to the next across the internet, whether it be AP, Washington Post, USA etc. I think it was at most a matter of days, before the label was being applied from one magat to another. So polite. It used to be newspapers were the only avenue of different takes on a news stories, but no more. Must be very difficult to get, and keep the job of a journalist these days.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MSNBC is a huge part of the problem [View all] JMCKUSICK Dec 3 OP

Bullshite. milestogo Dec 3 #1

What about it? JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #2

I'm with that poster, bullshit. arthritisR_US Dec 3 #4

I asked that poster and I'll ask you. JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #10

Take in Nicole Wallace, Rachel and Lawrence and Ali Velchi arthritisR_US Dec 3 #14

I mentioned 3 of the 4 in another reply and JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #18

So we need absolutely 0 legacy media, because JCMach1 Dec 3 #53

That's an odd approach to being informed. Just IMO. dchill Dec 3 #3

Not being informed, ignorance is another thing. arthritisR_US Dec 3 #5

What exactly was I being informed about JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #7

Rachel doesn't wash rince and repeat she does her research arthritisR_US Dec 3 #20

I looked to MSNBC for a deeper look into issues important to progressives William Seger Dec 3 #35

You think she isn't a source covering issues important to you ? arthritisR_US Dec 3 #36

No, that's what JMCKUSICK said about his "little existence here in central Illinois" William Seger Dec 3 #38

I'm sorry, I don't understand 🤔 arthritisR_US Dec 3 #40

The post I replied to William Seger Dec 3 #43

Good point. You know I get such valuable information from arthritisR_US Dec 3 #45

The problem with cable news isn't the partisan orientation of any one channel RockRaven Dec 3 #6

YES YES a thousand times YES JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #8

And, why is that ? arthritisR_US Dec 3 #21

My uneducated guess is ratings. mwooldri Dec 3 #33

Their corporate owners will only allow them to discuss topics La Coliniere Dec 3 #54

Like the majority of the viewers Fish700 Dec 3 #59

OK, dude. MSNBC has hosts with varying viewpoings, but it's not a cult. Pls see someone. brush Dec 3 #9

I mentioned Cult twice and neither has MSNBC attached to it. JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #13

So few people watch MSNBC, that it's irrelevant. Kaleva Dec 3 #11

Rural America is mostly White Christians and don't like it that Kamala Harris JI7 Dec 3 #12

That dismissiveness of rural Americans JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #15

Nobody is dismissing rural voters. They have choices every election and they are JI7 Dec 3 #19

Right, and like everything else these days JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #22

I said Trump voters are shit no matter where they are from JI7 Dec 3 #23

Yea no, you stereotyped Rural America JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #24

Maybe they don't like it but it's a fact, FFS. arthritisR_US Dec 3 #27

I said "mostly" . Just like most Muslims opposed Kamala Harris because they oppose LGBT JI7 Dec 3 #30

That made my heart cry 😞 arthritisR_US Dec 3 #26

To understand the Reps, just censor all the negative news about Trump/the Repubs kerry-is-my-prez Dec 3 #25

You learn "dismissiveness of rural Americans" SharonClark Dec 3 #28

Thank you👍🏼 arthritisR_US Dec 3 #42

One more time I live in a rural area. Basically Appalachian white. Keepthesoulalive Dec 3 #29

In Michigan, more people in urban areas voted for Trump then in the rural areas Kaleva Dec 3 #16

They are shit also JI7 Dec 3 #17

In the 2020 presidential election SharonClark Dec 3 #31

That doesn't refute what I said Kaleva Dec 3 #44

Was what Kamala was saying a lie? arthritisR_US Dec 3 #37

Too often it's nothing more than PR for the Democratic Party BeyondGeography Dec 3 #32

With the orange shitgibbon in charge the midterms will need arthritisR_US Dec 3 #39

No need for my comment. DU has taken care of the light weight. nt Jit423 Dec 3 #34

I kind of agree Startint Dec 3 #41

I never watch fox JMCKUSICK Dec 3 #47

I think your premise is simplistic Henry203 Dec 3 #56

For the love of Goddess--would you learn how to use paragraphs? hlthe2b Dec 3 #46

Interesting ThePartyThatListens Dec 3 #48

Fox is mandatory on all cable and satellite packages due to must carry regulations. SamKnause Dec 3 #49

I would say some parts of MSNBC are part of the problem. City Lights Dec 3 #50

This post needs hard returns. If you want people to read it, make it friendly to read. -nt CrispyQ Dec 3 #51

Appreciate the time you took to lay that out kerouac2 Dec 3 #52

I quit Rebl2 Dec 3 #55

I stopped watching cable news six months ago and Fichefinder Dec 3 #57

It's the entire media conglomeration stillcool Dec 3 #58

I watch free speech tv I_UndergroundPanther Dec 3 #60

Anyone who sits around watching TV all day GusBob Dec 3 #61