Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

hlthe2b

(106,778 posts)
11. This is a subject so rife with misunderstandings (intentional and less so) that only the most adamant
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 11:47 AM
Dec 4

(and often "factually wrong" ) are left to discuss it. Thus we get the "hot potato" attitude and approach that has angered everyone, no matter their views.

Even in medicine, most are tired of the inability to discuss without inciting misinterpretations and anger. Yet, in the ER, a full understanding of individual biological issues are paramount to avoid toxic administration of drugs to someone who COULD be pregnant. Yet, even asking (sensitively) to ascertain whether or not a pregnancy test must be ordered before certain anesthetic procedures are performed or medications ordered has resulted in angry, sometimes violent responses by those who refuse to allow for an explanation as to the reasoning and thus the nature of this standard policy.

So, in the one setting where sensitivity is most likely to occur, it remains nearly as difficult an issue for discussion as among those whose motivations are far less benign. I HATE that that is the case.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Dec 4 OP
Ted Cruz's sex-change TV ads gave him another term dalton99a Dec 4 #1
You're not going to get an honest discussion about trans issues from Helen Lewis. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 4 #2
Exactly Blue_Tires Dec 4 #16
Good luck with that. BannonsLiver Dec 4 #3
Post removed Post removed Dec 4 #4
As a trans woman I find that incredibly offensive AZSkiffyGeek Dec 4 #12
I get what you are saying. But also women have long history of attempting to shed gender roles. boston bean Dec 4 #17
I understand that viewpoint and don't think it conflicts with trans people. Oneironaut Dec 4 #23
That is understood. But I think sometimes is looked upon as an attack, when it is not. boston bean Dec 4 #34
Sometimes the context it's coming from is transphobic, however, tbh. Oneironaut Dec 4 #37
Gender "roles" are fully ridiculous Charging Triceratops Dec 4 #39
This ain't it, chief. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 4 #20
Wow. First - just a reminder - Ms. Toad Dec 4 #47
Let's hear more directly from trans people. LAS14 Dec 4 #63
I always find the shower concern hilarious meadowlander Dec 4 #72
From Lewis? Passages Dec 4 #5
Approximately 1% of the US population identify as transgender (from a google search) - somehow that 1% becomes of vast NoMoreRepugs Dec 4 #6
I agree. It's an example of clever strategy by Republicans. yardwork Dec 4 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Demovictory9 Dec 4 #13
Ah, that was the "Harris is for they/them" ad. It ran absolutely everywhere in the country for weeks. bearsfootball516 Dec 4 #31
It was devastatingly effective. yardwork Dec 4 #33
She could have stated how she felt about using LeftInTX Dec 4 #42
Same strategy used in 2004 with same gender marriage. Ms. Toad Dec 4 #49
I thought voters would recognize that Trump also supported gender affirming care for inmates using taxpayer dollars Shambala Dec 4 #56
Those ads were relentless moose65 Dec 4 #70
Apparently nearly 30% of Gen Z consider themselves LBGTQ. pandr32 Dec 4 #19
In my swing state (still mostly red), the ad where Charlemagne said "Hell no I don't want my tax money going Silent Type Dec 4 #7
Kark Rove made his career out of turning an opponent's strength into a weakness dalton99a Dec 4 #8
So Charlemagne is also TommyT139 Dec 4 #48
I agree. Voters apparently did not. Silent Type Dec 4 #51
Of course - but this argument wasn't made, either. TommyT139 Dec 4 #53
They edited the video to remove the context. Scipio Africanus Dec 4 #55
That wasn't a problem until 2020. Initech Dec 4 #10
Blame lies where it always does and thatvit with the american voters Fullduplexxx Dec 4 #27
That doesn't work Cirsium Dec 4 #58
Don't fool yourself - it was an issue, Ms. Toad Dec 4 #52
The funny thing is the people screaming about trans women in sports... Initech Dec 4 #82
This is a subject so rife with misunderstandings (intentional and less so) that only the most adamant hlthe2b Dec 4 #11
The angry attacks on healthcare providers ramped up during COVID. yardwork Dec 4 #35
I had to laugh even though it is not funny. Honestly, I only wish this was news to me. hlthe2b Dec 4 #41
No. Quiet Em Dec 4 #14
You might want to let the republicans know. BannonsLiver Dec 4 #24
Don't really care about ignorant Republicans who have no knowledge or understanding of the issue Quiet Em Dec 4 #25
Yeah, I read that book too. BannonsLiver Dec 4 #28
Not sure what you are referring to. Quiet Em Dec 4 #29
Bullshit. Democrats need learn to focus Americans' attention on the things that actually Scrivener7 Dec 4 #15
You are so right. The Republicans ran with a rapist and convicted felon for president who was awaiting trial muriel_volestrangler Dec 4 #26
It also shows, and I take heat for saying this but it's obvious, that Democrats need Scrivener7 Dec 4 #30
I'm enjoying the bus tires running us over. /s Oneironaut Dec 4 #18
Oof, yeah AZSkiffyGeek Dec 4 #22
This is the key point. yardwork Dec 4 #40
It's the Willy Horton ploy LeftInTX Dec 4 #44
Yes. It's always something. yardwork Dec 4 #66
That ad worked in Detroit. Kid Berwyn Dec 4 #21
"Trans girls playing in girls' sports" is itself a rightwing dog whistle LearnedHand Dec 4 #32
Transgender rights are a prelude. Voltaire2 Dec 4 #36
They are going after divorce for women Bettie Dec 4 #64
This issue hurt more than inflation JI7 Dec 4 #38
And it's a non-issue. yardwork Dec 4 #43
I recall correctly, I think GusBob Dec 4 #45
It is not "inferred rather strongly," it is explicitly against the rules of the forum. Ms. Toad Dec 4 #59
Post removed Post removed Dec 4 #61
You cannot advocate to restrict the rights of trans individuals on a progressive/left political forum, Ms. Toad Dec 4 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author Abolishinist Dec 4 #69
If you don't understand why discrimination is wrong I'm not sure what to say AZSkiffyGeek Dec 4 #73
I remember similar shout-outs over racial segregation. DJ Synikus Makisimus Dec 4 #46
When Jimmy Carter sent Amy to a public school in Washington DC Jk23 Dec 4 #50
Boston was where the battle against segregation ended. DJ Synikus Makisimus Dec 4 #60
JK23 What motivated you to join DU? 33taw Dec 4 #54
Good question. Scrivener7 Dec 4 #65
I wish we could make Zoey Tur a spokesperson. LAS14 Dec 4 #57
This topic infuriates me ismnotwasm Dec 4 #62
I have never understood the debate. Asa13 Dec 4 #67
Post removed Post removed Dec 4 #71
Democrats shouldn't stand up for human rights, gotcha! AZSkiffyGeek Dec 4 #74
Post removed Post removed Dec 4 #77
Then I think the people you talk to should educate themselves. Oneironaut Dec 4 #79
"I have never met a single person who thinks individuals born as males should be playing female sports" LAS14 Dec 4 #80
I believe you have never met a single person who is transgender. Quiet Em Dec 4 #81
Also, explaining it requires more than 15 seconds of effort/thought and the desire to learn on the part of the person meadowlander Dec 4 #78
OP, thank you for having the courage to raise this topic in such a thoughtful manner... PeaceWave Dec 4 #75
Enough is enough!! BootOutTheGoons Dec 4 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #11