Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Ms. Toad
(35,619 posts)59. It is not "inferred rather strongly," it is explicitly against the rules of the forum.
Per EarlG (the site owner, and likely the person who shut down the discussion you were remembering):
For your information, our definition of transphobia includes, but is not limited to: Misgendering, deadnaming, or otherwise refusing to recognize a trans person's gender identity; Arguing that trans people are not "real" men or women; Arguing that trans people should not have the same rights as cis people -- for example, the right to use public restrooms or play sports that match their gender identity; Arguing that there is any scientific basis for discriminating against trans people.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/101312142
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're not going to get an honest discussion about trans issues from Helen Lewis.
WhiskeyGrinder
Dec 4
#2
I get what you are saying. But also women have long history of attempting to shed gender roles.
boston bean
Dec 4
#17
That is understood. But I think sometimes is looked upon as an attack, when it is not.
boston bean
Dec 4
#34
Approximately 1% of the US population identify as transgender (from a google search) - somehow that 1% becomes of vast
NoMoreRepugs
Dec 4
#6
Ah, that was the "Harris is for they/them" ad. It ran absolutely everywhere in the country for weeks.
bearsfootball516
Dec 4
#31
I thought voters would recognize that Trump also supported gender affirming care for inmates using taxpayer dollars
Shambala
Dec 4
#56
In my swing state (still mostly red), the ad where Charlemagne said "Hell no I don't want my tax money going
Silent Type
Dec 4
#7
This is a subject so rife with misunderstandings (intentional and less so) that only the most adamant
hlthe2b
Dec 4
#11
I had to laugh even though it is not funny. Honestly, I only wish this was news to me.
hlthe2b
Dec 4
#41
Don't really care about ignorant Republicans who have no knowledge or understanding of the issue
Quiet Em
Dec 4
#25
Bullshit. Democrats need learn to focus Americans' attention on the things that actually
Scrivener7
Dec 4
#15
You are so right. The Republicans ran with a rapist and convicted felon for president who was awaiting trial
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 4
#26
It also shows, and I take heat for saying this but it's obvious, that Democrats need
Scrivener7
Dec 4
#30
It is not "inferred rather strongly," it is explicitly against the rules of the forum.
Ms. Toad
Dec 4
#59
You cannot advocate to restrict the rights of trans individuals on a progressive/left political forum,
Ms. Toad
Dec 4
#68
"I have never met a single person who thinks individuals born as males should be playing female sports"
LAS14
Dec 4
#80
Also, explaining it requires more than 15 seconds of effort/thought and the desire to learn on the part of the person
meadowlander
Dec 4
#78