Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(19,000 posts)

1. Does it meet the criteria?

Reply to TheProle (Original post)

Thu Dec 5, 2024, 11:57 AM

Dec 5

It seems the murder was intended to use coercion or intimidation to influence corporate , not government policy.

If a suspect is apprehended, I’m not sure they could be charged with anything but murder.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Passages Attilatheblond TrunKated

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CEO Killer: Domestic Terrorist [View all] TheProle Dec 5 OP

Does it meet the criteria? Fiendish Thingy Dec 5 #1

Fair points, TheProle Dec 5 #2

I think Fiendy is correct. nt yagotme Dec 5 #4

If he shot the CEO because of UHC's policies, it was in retaliation for Ocelot II Dec 5 #3

I agree. If that was the shooter's motive, it was an assassination. yardwork Dec 5 #7

The Oligarch run state will ALWAYS declare an attack on them is an attack on 'the State' Attilatheblond Dec 5 #16

Wealthy corporations making billions fleecing and killing Americans are not the US government. Irish_Dem Dec 5 #5

And they do it legally.... Happy Hoosier Dec 5 #11

Yes the US has made it legal to kill and torment Americans in many different ways. Irish_Dem Dec 5 #13

That's the theroy anyway Attilatheblond Dec 5 #20

So as usual special consideration for the wealthiest people. mucifer Dec 5 #6

It's not special consideration. Attacking *anyone* for commercial behavior Ocelot II Dec 5 #9

Yep Attilatheblond Dec 5 #21

Nope. Kingofalldems Dec 5 #8

THAT is terrorism Attilatheblond Dec 5 #22

Ignorant question GusBob Dec 5 #10

While it definitely seems like revenge TheProle Dec 5 #12

At the moment no, sarisataka Dec 5 #14

LOL n/t leftstreet Dec 5 #15

Still laughing out loud? TheProle Dec 18 #24

They've got to label the shooter a terrorist. k55f5r Dec 5 #17

Post removed Post removed Dec 5 #18

Corporations are the State and have been for awhile. I wouldn't be surprised if this is classified as a terrorist act. jalan48 Dec 5 #19

Or domestic enemy as stated in the oath of office. And the orange one still walks free. nt Hotler Dec 5 #23