Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quiet Em

(1,622 posts)
35. Here is what Democratic Senators say about it,
Thu Dec 5, 2024, 06:33 PM
Dec 2024
But Article V of the Constitution does not
impose a time limit for ratification of a proposed amendment, nor does it give Congress the
power to do so.


The full letter is at this link.

https://styleweekly.wppcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/PastedGraphic-1.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow, that is an excellent idea. I hadn't heard about that. That would cement his legacy. walkingman Dec 2024 #1
great idea rich7862 Dec 2024 #2
K&R Docreed2003 Dec 2024 #3
What is the hold up. onecaliberal Dec 2024 #4
It expired in 1982 Polybius Dec 2024 #22
I did not know this. And yes, we are out of time. Hekate Dec 2024 #5
DURec leftstreet Dec 2024 #6
It's not that simple. There was a time limit and since then, 5 states have rescinded their votes MichMan Dec 2024 #7
It would clearly H2O Man Dec 2024 #8
That's a heckuva speculation BWdem4life Dec 2024 #9
Fair question. H2O Man Dec 2024 #11
It might be 9-0, and rightfully so Polybius Dec 2024 #23
There will be NO chance it goes through the net if he DOESN'T take the shot. Beartracks Dec 2024 #42
It was written with an expiration date Polybius Dec 2024 #20
According to the Brennan Center there is precedent for the SC leaving it to Congress Quiet Em Dec 2024 #12
They can "leave it to Congress" and still kill it FBaggins Dec 2024 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author usonian Dec 2024 #10
K & R SunSeeker Dec 2024 #13
Go Out With A Bang President Biden. DO IT. DallasNE Dec 2024 #14
I think Biden should just 'do it'. It either sticks or it does not. mackdaddy Dec 2024 #15
K&R spanone Dec 2024 #16
Since losing the election Biden should have been everything he could possibly do to protect eh American patricia92243 Dec 2024 #17
It would be challenged in the MAGA SCOTUS Fiendish Thingy Dec 2024 #18
i would think those 46 senators would know if there was a sunset date. and from what i've been reading tonight, it orleans Dec 2024 #19
The time for removing the expiration date was 1982 Polybius Dec 2024 #24
Not only that, that term of Congress has passed MichMan Dec 2024 #27
A resolution is not a law. Nt Fiendish Thingy Dec 2024 #28
Yeah, that's not gonna work Polybius Dec 2024 #21
Make it so BoRaGard Dec 2024 #25
100 years overdue lindysalsagal Dec 2024 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author lindysalsagal Dec 2024 #30
Biden pardoned his boy, this would "pardon" the rest of us, YES please NotHardly Dec 2024 #31
Absolutely none, Joe. republianmushroom Dec 2024 #32
Dumb question here. I don't get it. What's happening here ? If it was ratified by the required number of states why Pepsidog Dec 2024 #33
I thought the deadline passed. I Buttoneer Dec 2024 #34
Here is what Democratic Senators say about it, Quiet Em Dec 2024 #35
Every amendment that has passed since prohibition had had a time limit imposed by Congress. n/t MichMan Dec 2024 #39
The Supreme Court would have to overturn a previous decision allowing Congress to set a ratification deadline. LudwigPastorius Dec 2024 #41
Senators Gillibrand, Schumer, Heinrich, Merkley, Quiet Em Dec 2024 #36
Biden cannot do it. only the Archivist can do it. However, soldierant Dec 2024 #37
Waaaay overdue. Please do it. Evolve Dammit Dec 2024 #38
Come on Joe proud patriot Dec 2024 #40
Randi Rhodes has been discussing this proud patriot Dec 2024 #43
The "time limit" of seven years was always bullshit. So were states trying to "rescind" their ratifications of ERA. valleyrogue Dec 2024 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"46 Senators Call on Bide...»Reply #35