Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Yorker: A Man Was Murdered in Cold Blood and You're Laughing? [View all]City Lights
(25,434 posts)26. I'm not laughing.
I just don't think his life is worth more than any other life taken in cold blood by the gun crisis in the US.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
12 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New Yorker: A Man Was Murdered in Cold Blood and You're Laughing? [View all]
Dennis Donovan
Dec 7
OP
No they don't and I'll bet money you can't provide a citation for that. I get you are are trying to justify shooting
Silent Type
Dec 7
#4
You accept every thing you read. That's initial denials AND requests for additional info.
Silent Type
Dec 7
#14
If you provide a citation for ultimate denials, not initial ones quickly overturned I'll contribute $25 to your favorite
Silent Type
Dec 7
#21
You said they denied 30%, they don't. You left out the most important part about approving once lazy doctors
Silent Type
Dec 7
#27
Yes, but they did point out that you didn't provide it from the approved list of sources in their head
ThreeNoSeep
Dec 7
#45
Just accept the fact that a corporation loyalties are to the executives and stock holders. The executives
LiberalArkie
Dec 7
#63
After reading this thread, I'm starting to wonder and it damn sure isn't you.....
chouchou
Dec 7
#90
I love that you are willing to die on this hill being factually wrong and mildly abusive.
ZonkerHarris
Dec 8
#155
Does writer of article sound qualified. Her main article before was on "Britney Spears's conservatorship nightmare."
Silent Type
Dec 7
#44
Interesting that you don't see her qualifications the way I do. Ronan Farrow is an award-winning researcher/author...
Hekate
Dec 7
#58
She sounds to be a very good writer. As is Ronan Farrow. That's for showing us how qualified
Autumn
Dec 7
#73
No joke. It's time Congress gets of their rears. They've had 60 years to enact something decent, and haven't.
Silent Type
Dec 7
#77
I bet we couldn't get 85% of Democrats to vote for universal HC without private insurers involved. ACA
Silent Type
Dec 7
#119
Yikes, where are you coming from with this attitude defending the undefensible?
roscoeroscoe
Dec 8
#130
That attack on another DUer is unjustified and really wrong. That data was posted earlier.
hlthe2b
Dec 7
#9
Nol It is not. Multiple sources report the highest denials rate and further that they were using AI
hlthe2b
Dec 7
#29
That you keep changing to new strawman arguments is not working. It only shows you for
hlthe2b
Dec 7
#41
Initial denials, final denials are like 9% and most are resolved quickly. Doctors do bill Botox for headaches when
Silent Type
Dec 7
#19
There's also slipperiness in attributing initial denials to minor errors and "lazy doctors"
Prairie Gates
Dec 7
#53
I work for insurance claims. I know how hard it is to push a totally valid claim thru with all the info
LizBeth
Dec 8
#145
When multiple corporations practice legalized murder for profit, I guess you could say that
Hekate
Dec 7
#71
where are your citations/references that prove they don't deny claims at that rate?
Genevra
Dec 7
#65
It's bad enough when trumpsters were the goons, it's another when Democrats join in.
Silent Type
Dec 7
#2
Probably not, but they darn sure aren't what I expect from fellow Democrats. YMMV
Silent Type
Dec 7
#50
I don't visit some of the internet areas that supposedly are so "horrific" on the comments. That said,
hlthe2b
Dec 7
#3
Laughing at evil people dying is generally normal. Pretending an evil man was good or deserving of sympathy, is not.
ColinC
Dec 7
#6
When huge insurance companies engage in causing economic disaster and even widescale deaths for profit
Attilatheblond
Dec 7
#13
Perhaps this sadistic trend could be ended by lining up all of the chortling trolls and shooting them in the back.
OilemFirchen
Dec 7
#39
Knowing what Brian Thompson is infamous for, I honestly can't say that I have anymore sympathy for him than I had
W T F
Dec 7
#82
We just witnessed the final nail in the coffin of democracy and the elite's are surprised we don't give a flying fuck
yaesu
Dec 7
#86
It's despicable - anyone applauding or condoning the murder of someone operating within the bounds of the law had better
Midwestern Democrat
Dec 8
#123
"UnitedHealth Group, a health-insurance conglomerate valued at five hundred and sixty billion dollars."
Botany
Dec 8
#129
I'm starting to LMAO every time it's mentioned The angst over this asshole being shot compared to the
Autumn
Dec 8
#147