Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Updated in Post 67. Some guy shot the head of a health insurance company in the back. [View all]unblock
(54,732 posts)45. Agreed. The prosecution doesn't need to enter the defendant's mind.
But if the defendant can't explain his motives if he wanted to, that would be truly shocking to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Updated in Post 67. Some guy shot the head of a health insurance company in the back. [View all]
MineralMan
Dec 2024
OP
Yep. Go back to sleep, go back to health insurance companies legally killing people for MONEY
ck4829
Dec 2024
#6
+1. If I were a juror and he had personally witnessed the death of family/friend because of denials, I might have had
Silent Type
Dec 2024
#8
In New York it's second degree murder. This case does not meet the requirements for first degree murder in New York.
unblock
Dec 2024
#16
Interesting. Two other health insurance companies in Minnesota are shut down.
MineralMan
Dec 2024
#39
I think it's a thin argument and a prosecutor would more likely go for the nearly sure thing second degree, but
unblock
Dec 2024
#66
How can righteous moralizers preemptively wag their fingers if they have to wait for evidence and charges?
Orrex
Dec 2024
#52
There are people on Reddit wishing death on the McDonald's employee who tipped off NYPD nt
Bookreadingliberal53
Dec 2024
#27