General Discussion

Autumn

(46,667 posts)

1. We spent the last four years fighting them. That went well. Ya think?

Reply to bigtree (Original post)

Tue Dec 10, 2024, 10:35 PM

Dec 10

&t=15s

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

jalan48 SunImp BigmanPigman BeerBarrelPolka Passages Xavier Breath republianmushroom

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you're backbiting at Biden, Garland, Kamala, or any other lame duck you're defending the past, not the future [View all] bigtree Dec 10 OP

We spent the last four years fighting them. That went well. Ya think? Autumn Dec 10 #1

Who is Garland? nt LexVegas Dec 10 #2

A very well paid wallflower. BannonsLiver Dec 11 #34

Did you just throw in Harris and Biden edhopper Dec 10 #3

Gov Shapiro Is being "attacked" Here... Cha Dec 10 #4

Nothing to do with the OPs edhopper Dec 10 #6

It has to do with This in the OP.. Cha Dec 10 #8

OP edhopper Dec 10 #9

Yes. BannonsLiver Dec 11 #35

Attacks on the best Democratic president of our lifetime are not happening here. But the stretch is Autumn Dec 11 #37

this is you, not seeing or acknowledging anything but the Garland derisions bigtree Dec 11 #41

Please stop gaslighting edhopper Dec 11 #53

you missed the point of the post bigtree Dec 11 #56

All I see is another failed attempt edhopper Dec 11 #62

nothing in the op 'defended Garland' bigtree Dec 11 #65

Post removed Post removed Dec 11 #45

So true, Thank you, bigtree. Hekate Dec 10 #5

Dems need to learn from our mistakes choie Dec 10 #7

3-2-1... the 20-20 Hindsight Opus... ancianita Dec 10 #12

Yeah and your post shows some of us haven't choie Dec 11 #14

Do tell. ancianita Dec 11 #16

Maybe the lesson here for some is that their Scrivener7 Dec 11 #26

what fucking good was hindsight? bigtree Dec 11 #32

Well, you are still defending Garland. You haven't reached the hindsight Scrivener7 Dec 11 #46

OK. This actually made me laugh. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #24

People are either lazy or scared newdeal2 Dec 10 #10

Thank you! What good does this mindless habit do for either the Underground or its new forum ancianita Dec 10 #11

Oh my god choie Dec 11 #17

Do tell us what the same thing over and over again was. Lay all the mistakes out so we can learn to ancianita Dec 11 #18

The point is to win iemanja Dec 11 #23

For a start, is there a need to reply to that perfectly reasonable observation Scrivener7 Dec 11 #27

thank goodness you are not running the party berksdem Dec 11 #42

"love your party" Sympthsical Dec 11 #33

That already happened Cirsium Dec 10 #13

believe me, I CAN DO BOTH Skittles Dec 11 #15

garland is not a Democrat ecstatic Dec 11 #19

no, he was an AG who prosecuted over 1200 republican, white supremacist Trump supporting rioters and their leaders bigtree Dec 11 #31

Here? There? Neither? dchill Dec 11 #20

Garland? iemanja Dec 11 #21

What about McConnell? Felicita Dec 11 #28

Yes. And? iemanja Dec 11 #29

Lol! If you're STILL defending Garland, you should stop doing the Scrivener7 Dec 11 #22

haven't read a word of criticism from you for the Trump judges who delayed the prosecutions bigtree Dec 11 #30

Still at it. It's sad at this point. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #47

I've had enough of Marcy Wheeler's bullshit thebigidea Dec 11 #50

She was the only one saying he was doing anything. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #51

I made a broader point about lame duck pols and others who are being discussed as if they're consequential to the future bigtree Dec 11 #55

Wall o' words. Justification o' nonsense. Waste o' time. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #57

I have a library full of words that won't be read by anyone still alive bigtree Dec 11 #58

"Agree with meee!! If you don't, you're uninformed!!1!" Scrivener7 Dec 11 #59

'I thought something' bigtree Dec 11 #60

"Agree with meeee!!1! Garland is great!!1! It's everyone else's fault!!1! I can't be wrong!!1!" Scrivener7 Dec 11 #61

so, projection it is bigtree Dec 11 #64

Lol. Bigtree, you know that makes no sense. But I imagine Scrivener7 Dec 11 #66

this is what I'm responding to from you: bigtree Dec 11 #67

Garland? Shit, I'm still backbiting Ralph Nader NBachers Dec 11 #25

LOL BannonsLiver Dec 11 #36

Bull. We need a real examination as to what is wrong boston bean Dec 11 #38

De-rec. Celerity Dec 11 #39

Absolutely BeerBarrelPolka Dec 11 #40

Is there a way to unrecommend a post? berksdem Dec 11 #43

There's unfortunately nothing more we can do about Fuckface but wait for the Big Macs to do their thing. Initech Dec 11 #44

er... why? Why the fuck would the current GOP ever, EVER want to lose power? thebigidea Dec 11 #49

They are drunk with power and out of control. Initech Dec 11 #54

if you're wasting time defending a used condom like Garland, you will never get over the past thebigidea Dec 11 #48

Indeed! MineralMan Dec 11 #52

Why would you even create this OP? Intractable Dec 11 #63