General Discussion

bigtree

(90,287 posts)

67. this is what I'm responding to from you:

Wed Dec 11, 2024, 03:18 PM

Dec 11

"Agree with meee!! If you don't, you're uninformed!!1!"

"Agree with meeee!!1! Garland is great!!1! It's everyone else's fault!!1! I can't be wrong!!1!"

I'm not going to pretend those are sensible responses to my replies to you, or something. I mean, you used the exact script folks here used to describe freeper posts in the past. A not so clever swipe, which is really just a personal attack.

Maybe discussing something to do with the point in the op about lame ducks would have been better than this silliness.

You could have just done that, right?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you're backbiting at Biden, Garland, Kamala, or any other lame duck you're defending the past, not the future [View all] bigtree Dec 10 OP

We spent the last four years fighting them. That went well. Ya think? Autumn Dec 10 #1

Who is Garland? nt LexVegas Dec 10 #2

A very well paid wallflower. BannonsLiver Dec 11 #34

Did you just throw in Harris and Biden edhopper Dec 10 #3

Gov Shapiro Is being "attacked" Here... Cha Dec 10 #4

Nothing to do with the OPs edhopper Dec 10 #6

It has to do with This in the OP.. Cha Dec 10 #8

OP edhopper Dec 10 #9

Yes. BannonsLiver Dec 11 #35

Attacks on the best Democratic president of our lifetime are not happening here. But the stretch is Autumn Dec 11 #37

this is you, not seeing or acknowledging anything but the Garland derisions bigtree Dec 11 #41

Please stop gaslighting edhopper Dec 11 #53

you missed the point of the post bigtree Dec 11 #56

All I see is another failed attempt edhopper Dec 11 #62

nothing in the op 'defended Garland' bigtree Dec 11 #65

Post removed Post removed Dec 11 #45

So true, Thank you, bigtree. Hekate Dec 10 #5

Dems need to learn from our mistakes choie Dec 10 #7

3-2-1... the 20-20 Hindsight Opus... ancianita Dec 10 #12

Yeah and your post shows some of us haven't choie Dec 11 #14

Do tell. ancianita Dec 11 #16

Maybe the lesson here for some is that their Scrivener7 Dec 11 #26

what fucking good was hindsight? bigtree Dec 11 #32

Well, you are still defending Garland. You haven't reached the hindsight Scrivener7 Dec 11 #46

OK. This actually made me laugh. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #24

People are either lazy or scared newdeal2 Dec 10 #10

Thank you! What good does this mindless habit do for either the Underground or its new forum ancianita Dec 10 #11

Oh my god choie Dec 11 #17

Do tell us what the same thing over and over again was. Lay all the mistakes out so we can learn to ancianita Dec 11 #18

The point is to win iemanja Dec 11 #23

For a start, is there a need to reply to that perfectly reasonable observation Scrivener7 Dec 11 #27

thank goodness you are not running the party berksdem Dec 11 #42

"love your party" Sympthsical Dec 11 #33

That already happened Cirsium Dec 10 #13

believe me, I CAN DO BOTH Skittles Dec 11 #15

garland is not a Democrat ecstatic Dec 11 #19

no, he was an AG who prosecuted over 1200 republican, white supremacist Trump supporting rioters and their leaders bigtree Dec 11 #31

Here? There? Neither? dchill Dec 11 #20

Garland? iemanja Dec 11 #21

What about McConnell? Felicita Dec 11 #28

Yes. And? iemanja Dec 11 #29

Lol! If you're STILL defending Garland, you should stop doing the Scrivener7 Dec 11 #22

haven't read a word of criticism from you for the Trump judges who delayed the prosecutions bigtree Dec 11 #30

Still at it. It's sad at this point. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #47

I've had enough of Marcy Wheeler's bullshit thebigidea Dec 11 #50

She was the only one saying he was doing anything. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #51

I made a broader point about lame duck pols and others who are being discussed as if they're consequential to the future bigtree Dec 11 #55

Wall o' words. Justification o' nonsense. Waste o' time. Scrivener7 Dec 11 #57

I have a library full of words that won't be read by anyone still alive bigtree Dec 11 #58

"Agree with meee!! If you don't, you're uninformed!!1!" Scrivener7 Dec 11 #59

'I thought something' bigtree Dec 11 #60

"Agree with meeee!!1! Garland is great!!1! It's everyone else's fault!!1! I can't be wrong!!1!" Scrivener7 Dec 11 #61

so, projection it is bigtree Dec 11 #64

Lol. Bigtree, you know that makes no sense. But I imagine Scrivener7 Dec 11 #66

this is what I'm responding to from you: bigtree Dec 11 #67

Garland? Shit, I'm still backbiting Ralph Nader NBachers Dec 11 #25

LOL BannonsLiver Dec 11 #36

Bull. We need a real examination as to what is wrong boston bean Dec 11 #38

De-rec. Celerity Dec 11 #39

Absolutely BeerBarrelPolka Dec 11 #40

Is there a way to unrecommend a post? berksdem Dec 11 #43

There's unfortunately nothing more we can do about Fuckface but wait for the Big Macs to do their thing. Initech Dec 11 #44

er... why? Why the fuck would the current GOP ever, EVER want to lose power? thebigidea Dec 11 #49

They are drunk with power and out of control. Initech Dec 11 #54

if you're wasting time defending a used condom like Garland, you will never get over the past thebigidea Dec 11 #48

Indeed! MineralMan Dec 11 #52

Why would you even create this OP? Intractable Dec 11 #63