Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you suddenly found yourself working for an insurance company and received a claim that looks like this for MRI-- [View all]LeftInTX
(30,625 posts)73. You pay the allowed (customary) amount
The provider writes the rest off.
Happens all the time.
I don't know why it's that way. I used to freak out. Then I found put the provider writes the whole thing off. It's very strange.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you suddenly found yourself working for an insurance company and received a claim that looks like this for MRI-- [View all]
Silent Type
Dec 12
OP
It's not denied in the sense they will never pay. It's denied because they ain't gonna cut a check until they get
Silent Type
Dec 12
#5
There are also denials regarding valid claims and treatment approvals with delay tactics
Meowmee
Dec 12
#16
In my opinion it's the doc's office responsibility. They have all the information, they under codes,
Silent Type
Dec 12
#59
They've gotten care in most "claim" denials. Preauthorization is much the same. For example, Medicare's policy on MRIs
Silent Type
Dec 12
#8
You need to understand something. I have been for Medicare/caid-for-All since 1982. If I were to dig through my addict
Silent Type
Dec 12
#24
I'm saying insurance companies are not worse than other aspects of our healthcare system -- doctors, hospitals, big drug
Silent Type
Dec 14
#82
Medicare wouldn't ask you, they'd ask providers if claim wasn't coded well enough,
Silent Type
Dec 13
#71
I'm all for something like in other countries. I just don't see any Congress person with guts to tell millions of people
Silent Type
Dec 13
#74
I have had the same satisfactory experience with just plain Medicare, no supplemental no advantage
Walleye
Dec 14
#77
Hospitals and insurance companies work hand-in-hand on thousands of claims a week....
Think. Again.
Dec 12
#7
Yeah sure. That's how Medicare or private insurers end up paying claims to providers who don't even exist.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#9
One more time. Those are INITIAL denials -- similar to examples above -- that are overturned in over 80% of cases
Silent Type
Dec 12
#13
Oh, okay, so this doesn't even address the 34% of final claims denied by UHC.
Think. Again.
Dec 12
#15
Because 80+% of initial claim denials are reversed exactly as outlined in the OP. Have a good night.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#25
It happens with Medicaid because the government hires unscrupulous people to deny claims
questionseverything
Dec 12
#36
Good point, it ain't just private insurance. Medicaid and Medicare are government programs and likely model
Silent Type
Dec 12
#37
I'd have to see the bills. He might have been submitting improper bills, that were changed
Silent Type
Dec 12
#43
Like Wendell Potter, got rich supporting denying claims and felt guilty. Ask him if anyone died from his
Silent Type
Dec 12
#48
Yes. The actual claim form submitted electronically has a Units column. But, good example of claims not always making
Silent Type
Dec 12
#14
Example in OP includes meds. The type sedation -- xanax or something -- is pretty cheap. Well, unless provider cheats.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#20
If you are uninsured, someone might charge you $50 K. Insurance will not approve $12K, including Medicare.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#31
Let's say $12 K is going rate. Should insurer, including Medicare, pay $17K, or deny and ask for additional . . . . . .
Silent Type
Dec 12
#32
Give me a break. You know who Luigi shot and his rationale. Heard tonight Luigi was apparently never insured by UHC.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#30
So if he was never insured by them he certianly wasnt denied a payment claim by them.
Eko
Dec 12
#40
OK, guess his manifesto said nothing about denials, claims, pre authorization. And UHC never insured him
Silent Type
Dec 12
#46
Read the last paragraph. I explain that. But very few here are going to understand what an electronic claims looks like.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#21
I answered your question since you didn't read the note in OP. Have a good evening.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#44
I didn't ask you any questions. Your notes in the OP are inadequate. Good night. eom.
vanessa_ca
Dec 12
#49
Got a good laugh out of that, actually. I do care about shooting someone in the back while being misinformed.
Silent Type
Dec 12
#26
Get it and envious. But lot of the blame is on greedy providers for prices. I've never seen Medicare or private insurers
Silent Type
Dec 12
#33
Fun fact: UHC employees have been ordered to defend their murders. N/t
Hellbound Hellhound
Dec 12
#52
Considering the misinformation, Luigi cult, etc., don't blame them too. When people catch on government programs
Silent Type
Dec 12
#54
So what do think a typical insurer might pay? Three times Medicare, 1.5, even less than Medicare by requiring
Silent Type
Dec 12
#56
Not "defending" anyone. Trying to point out not just insurance. It's also Congress, Medicare, Providers,
Silent Type
Dec 12
#61
Think we ought to put blame where it belongs, Congress primarily for failing us.
Silent Type
Dec 13
#63
No, not in insurance business. There are federal guidelines too, not just state insurance laws. In fact
Silent Type
Dec 13
#70
You can look up the cost some procedures on the Medicare site (example for MRI below).
rog
Dec 14
#76
If a hospital charges $1800 for an MRI that is what the insurance company should pay
Autumn
Dec 14
#80