Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Updated in Post 67. Some guy shot the head of a health insurance company in the back. [View all]haele
(13,648 posts)68. Voir Dire will weed out anyone who admits to experiencing insurance denials
Several of the prosecution questions for the jury will be designed to ensure anyone who even has an acquaintance with someone who was experiencing coverage issues and suffered won't be on the jury, just in case they might end up with a person who lied about being able to weigh the case strictly on it's merits without attribution to the motive.
In other words, the jury pool will be small and most likely restricted down to people leaning towards Conservative, "Rule of Law" Capitalism credulous that a motive would be that CEOs could ever be considered responsible for a bad product so long as the shareholders are served.
I'm sure they could find two dozen like that in NYC.
Haele
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Updated in Post 67. Some guy shot the head of a health insurance company in the back. [View all]
MineralMan
Dec 9
OP
Yep. Go back to sleep, go back to health insurance companies legally killing people for MONEY
ck4829
Dec 9
#6
+1. If I were a juror and he had personally witnessed the death of family/friend because of denials, I might have had
Silent Type
Dec 9
#8
In New York it's second degree murder. This case does not meet the requirements for first degree murder in New York.
unblock
Dec 9
#16
I think it's a thin argument and a prosecutor would more likely go for the nearly sure thing second degree, but
unblock
Dec 9
#66
How can righteous moralizers preemptively wag their fingers if they have to wait for evidence and charges?
Orrex
Dec 9
#52
There are people on Reddit wishing death on the McDonald's employee who tipped off NYPD nt
Bookreadingliberal53
Dec 9
#27