Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

walkingman

(8,698 posts)

3. I think your right - it would more than likely have to start over but the thing

Reply to tritsofme (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 28, 2024, 04:43 PM

Dec 28

that chaps my ass is the GOP attitude "Republicans argue that women’s rights are protected under the 14th Amendment, adding that the ERA is unnecessary" this is bogus and they know it.

Although women's rights have come a long way since the 60s - it is by no means equal and if so the ERA would make it clear that there is no excuse for the lies, deceit, and misogyny by so many in America.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

brakester

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Path to Certifying the ERA Lies With Congress--Not the Archivist [View all] niyad Dec 28 OP

OK - a majority of House Members (218) must first sign a discharge petition for that purpose. walkingman Dec 28 #1

Can a simple majority in Congress even remove a deadline that was set by a supermajority? tritsofme Dec 28 #2

I think your right - it would more than likely have to start over but the thing walkingman Dec 28 #3

Rec'g just because snot Dec 28 #4