General Discussion

lapfog_1

(30,750 posts)

3. we aren't PAYING them to check in with "The White Lotus" while discussing secure material

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 12:21 PM

Mar 27

you f'ing idiots at the NYT.

I somehow did this for my 10 years in the federal government. In fact, when I was working I wasn't checking personal email, social media, etc while I was WORKING period... whether doing something classified or not.

I kept two laptops, two cell phones, etc for my entire tenure. I still do to this day. This is from my personal laptop. And today is a "free day" at my employment ( even though I will check in at work for a while later ).

This ISN'T that hard.

And the reason they were using "signal" is so that no records of them discussing committing possible war crimes would be preserved, not because they wanted to time share between discussing ( and laughing ) about killing a few dozen women and children in addition to "terrorists" without there being a record that could be used to put them in prison for life long after Trump is gone.

so much for the "liberal" press

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yorkster Prairie Gates RazorbackExpat orleans madwivoter RockCreek Grey5

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT pro-level both-sidesing [View all] dpibel Mar 27 OP

Rhetorical question: Why is anyone still reading or subscribing to the NYTs. jrthin Mar 27 #1

No SocialDemocrat61 Mar 27 #2

Sad how far that paper has fallen. And the RW claims it's "way to the left kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #11

Not to DU's high standards. maxsolomon Mar 27 #18

we aren't PAYING them to check in with "The White Lotus" while discussing secure material lapfog_1 Mar 27 #3

also a fairly cogent (and accessible) handling of the issue stopdiggin Mar 27 #4

The NYTs give w/one hand and takes back w/the other. jrthin Mar 27 #8

as opposed to those that are busy shoveling manure stopdiggin Mar 27 #10

Then stop following the particular argument that has circle "round, and done to the point jrthin Mar 27 #12

nah. as long as someone feels obligated to trot out a particular tired old saw stopdiggin Mar 27 #15

At least you concede the bias dpibel Mar 27 #17

I can point to 'loads' of reporting where the Times has taken a chunk out of Republicans stopdiggin Mar 27 #19

Fair or not fair? dpibel Mar 27 #20

what on earth makes you think I should (or would) be compelled stopdiggin Mar 28 #21

This you? dpibel Mar 28 #22

if I WANTED to, yes. stopdiggin Mar 28 #23

There's always the supporting your argument part dpibel Mar 28 #24

the 'argument' doesn't need support stopdiggin Mar 28 #26

The way that they diminish the importance: Oh, you want to watch White Lotus Prairie Gates Mar 27 #5

Y'know, that server Hillary Clinton had Bettie Mar 27 #6

It's Regime media. bronxiteforever Mar 27 #7

"the morning" IS editorial. maxsolomon Mar 27 #9

News analysis, actually dpibel Mar 27 #14

"News Analysis" gives reporters leeway to include opinion maxsolomon Mar 28 #27

I check Fox most days there's a big screwup hoping to see some sanity. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #13

Jaw dropping. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #16

You'd almost think there was an agenda... dpibel Mar 28 #25