General Discussion

kerry-is-my-prez

(9,740 posts)

13. I check Fox most days there's a big screwup hoping to see some sanity.

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 07:06 PM

Mar 27

The announcer said “there is one person in this that really needs to be talked about.” And I was foolish enough to think they were going to say Trump or Waltz or Hegseth. And then they said “Jeffrey Goldberg!” Am I insane or are there a whole bunch of crazy zombies AND evil to the core people manipulating these zombies? I will bet they’re going to go after Goldberg big time and instead of anyone REALLY to blame being charged with anything like treason, espionage, or fired we will see Goldberg and other people at the Atlantic being charged with espionage.

I officially give up on this country. I will never hope again that enough people will become sane or even halfway intelligent EVER again to make a difference. It is hopeless.

We all should have known better when Karl Rove didn’t get frog-marched to prison.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

John1956PA

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT pro-level both-sidesing [View all] dpibel Mar 27 OP

Rhetorical question: Why is anyone still reading or subscribing to the NYTs. jrthin Mar 27 #1

No SocialDemocrat61 Mar 27 #2

Sad how far that paper has fallen. And the RW claims it's "way to the left kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #11

Not to DU's high standards. maxsolomon Mar 27 #18

we aren't PAYING them to check in with "The White Lotus" while discussing secure material lapfog_1 Mar 27 #3

also a fairly cogent (and accessible) handling of the issue stopdiggin Mar 27 #4

The NYTs give w/one hand and takes back w/the other. jrthin Mar 27 #8

as opposed to those that are busy shoveling manure stopdiggin Mar 27 #10

Then stop following the particular argument that has circle "round, and done to the point jrthin Mar 27 #12

nah. as long as someone feels obligated to trot out a particular tired old saw stopdiggin Mar 27 #15

At least you concede the bias dpibel Mar 27 #17

I can point to 'loads' of reporting where the Times has taken a chunk out of Republicans stopdiggin Mar 27 #19

Fair or not fair? dpibel Mar 27 #20

what on earth makes you think I should (or would) be compelled stopdiggin Mar 28 #21

This you? dpibel Mar 28 #22

if I WANTED to, yes. stopdiggin Mar 28 #23

There's always the supporting your argument part dpibel Mar 28 #24

the 'argument' doesn't need support stopdiggin Mar 28 #26

The way that they diminish the importance: Oh, you want to watch White Lotus Prairie Gates Mar 27 #5

Y'know, that server Hillary Clinton had Bettie Mar 27 #6

It's Regime media. bronxiteforever Mar 27 #7

"the morning" IS editorial. maxsolomon Mar 27 #9

News analysis, actually dpibel Mar 27 #14

"News Analysis" gives reporters leeway to include opinion maxsolomon Mar 28 #27

I check Fox most days there's a big screwup hoping to see some sanity. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #13

Jaw dropping. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #16

You'd almost think there was an agenda... dpibel Mar 28 #25